National

Political Spoilsport Or A Serious Rival? DMK, AIADMK See Men Like Kamalahaasan As Khalnayaks

Sometimes driven by personal agenda or social issues like corruption, maverick Tamil leaders chew away crucial votes making bipolar contests a humdinger

Political Spoilsport Or A Serious Rival? DMK, AIADMK See Men Like Kamalahaasan As Khalnayaks
info_icon

They go by many names—spoilers, vote-cutters, also­-ran. But it’s difficult to dismiss these fringe players as inconsequential.

They have committed caste or community-based vote-banks or have mavericks at the helm. In Tamil Nadu, three leaders stand away from the bipolar contest of the DMK-AIADMK fronts—T.T.V. Dhinakaran of the AMMK, Kamalahaasan of the MNM, and Seeman of the NTK. They contested all 40 Lok Sabha seats and 22 assembly bypolls. What impact, one may ask?

Well, Dhina­karan’s sole purpose is to spoil the AIADMK’s chances and teach its leaders a lesson for betraying his aunt Sasikala. Spoiler alert: he could help the DMK front by chipping away at AIADMK votes. “Yes, we are spoilers if that is what you want to call us. Our presence would deny the AIADMK a win. More importantly, the votes we poll will show the people our force. We ­cannot be ignored after these elections,” party’s propaganda secretary Thanga Thamilselvan said.

Another spoiler for both the DMK and AIADMK could be Kamalahaasan, who has daubed both parties with the same black paint of corruption since failing to find a place in the Stalin initiative. He became a lone ranger but drew crowds, especially young voters. “We need to build on this base for the asse­mbly elections when Kamal would fight from a seat,” said the party’s South Chennai candidate, R. Rangarajan. The MNM is expected to poll around eight per cent in urban seats and many feel the actor-politician could pick votes that could have gone to the DMK.

Director Seeman, who started the NTK four years ago, contested all 234 seats in the 2016 assembly polls only to lose deposits everywhere. Unde­terred, he has fielded 20 women this time. His USP has been fiery speeches. “The youngsters who come to listen to him may not end up voting for him. That has been Seeman’s failure…unable to convert crowds into votes,” a party functionary said.

By G.C. Shekhar in Chennai

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement