1984 Anti-Sikh Riots: Delhi Court Reserves Order On Anticipatory Bail Plea Of Jagdish Tytler

A day after Congress leader Jagdish Tytler moved to Delhi court for seeking anticipatory bail regarding the case of the killing of three people in the Pul Bangladesh area during the 1984 Anti-Sikh riots, the court has reserved its order for August 4.

Jagdish Tytler

A Delhi court on Wednesday reserved for August 4 its order on the anticipatory bail application of Congress leader Jagdish Tytler in a case related to the killing of three people in Pul Bangash area here during the 1984 anti-Sikh riots.

Special Judge Vikas Dhull reserved the order after hearing arguments from the counsel appearing for Tytler and the CBI.

During the proceedings, a woman, who claimed to be a victim, told the court it has been 39 years and they have still not got justice, and broke down in front of the judge.

Senior advocate H S Phoolka, who has been representing the riot victims for around four decades, and other advocates calmed her down.

During the hearing, the CBI opposed Tytler's application.

“The witnesses have come forward showing great courage and the possibility of influencing them cannot be ruled out. As per the statement of new witnesses, prima facie the role of Jagdish Tytler appears...,” the CBI said.

Appearing for the victims, Phoolka also opposed the bail application and claimed Tytler had threatened him on live TV.

Phoolka said this was the first case in the country where a closure report was filed three times and the court rejected it every time.

“This is not just a case of killing of three Sikhs, it is a case related to the massacre of Sikhs. 3000 people were killed in broad daylight in Delhi... People who raped and killed Sikh women were honoured, that's why we are all seeing what is happening in Manipur today,” he said.

He added the same pattern of killings that took place during the Partition was in evidence during the anti-Sikh riots, and the communal riots in Gujarat, Muzaffarnagar and other places.

Phoolka said not just the witnesses but also lawyers were threatened in the case. Tytler is an influential person, he said.

“While considering the bail, the court should also keep in mind the gravity of the case. It was the worst massacre ever,” he said.

While seeking the relief, Tytler’s lawyer told the court his client was anticipating arrest and he should be granted bail.

“The exact time of the crime was not ascertained by the probe agency and multiple closure reports were filed in the case... Delhi Police twice and CBI once said nothing was found against Tytler,” Tytler’s advocate Manu Sharma told the court.

He said the CBI, after having filed a closure report in the case, submitted a charge sheet against Tytler on the basis of the statements of some new witnesses just 11 months before the Lok Sabha elections.

“CBI filed closure report several times in the case and opposed the protest petition too. CBI had given a clean chit while filing charge sheet in 2007 and 2014,” he said.

He also pointed out that the CBI did not arrest Tytler during the entire investigation.

“The witnesses included after 25 years cannot be trusted. Tytler is not a flight risk. He is the age of 79 and having medical issues,” the Congress leader's counsel told the court.


A city court had on July 26 summoned Tytler on August 5 after taking cognisance of a May 20 charge sheet filed by the CBI in the case.

Three people were killed and a gurdwara was set ablaze in Pul Bangash area here on November 1, 1984, a day after the then prime minister Indira Gandhi was assassinated by her Sikh bodyguards.

In its charge sheet filed before the court, the CBI alleged that Tytler "incited, instigated and provoked" the mob that had assembled at Pul Bangash Gurdwara in Azad Market on November 1, 1984, that resulted in the burning down of the gurdwara and killing of three Sikhs -- Thakur Singh, Badal Singh and Guru Charan Singh.

The agency has invoked charges under sections 147 (rioting) and 109 (abetment) read with 302 (murder) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), among others, against Tytler.

Important: We are happy to announce that we have successfully completed the migration of our site to enhance your experience as valuable user. But due to the scale of operations some data discrepancies may arise. We apologize for any inconvenience and thank you for your patience and understanding during this period.