The court held that the ₹20-crore allocation and implementation lacked mandatory budget provisions and breached the state's financial policies.
Petitioners, including Kerala Students' Union (KSU) president Aloshious Xavier, argued it was a disguised pre-election outreach benefiting the LDF, using public money and party-linked volunteers.
The government order was set aside, effectively quashing the programme; detailed judgment is awaited, but public funds cannot be used for it.
The appearance follows a breach of privilege notice moved by members of the ruling alliance, who claimed that Kamra’s comments were defamatory and undermined the dignity of the House and its members. The controversy stems from statements made by the comedian during a recent public performance and amplified through social media platforms.
Sources said the Privileges Committee sought clarification from Kamra regarding the context and intent of his remarks. Legislators argued that the statements went beyond satire and entered the realm of personal attack, warranting legislative intervention.
Kamra, known for his sharp political commentary, has maintained that his remarks fall within the ambit of free speech and satire. In past instances, he has defended his content as political critique rather than personal vilification.
The issue has sparked a broader debate on the limits of political satire and the scope of legislative privilege. While members of the ruling coalition demanded accountability, opposition leaders expressed concern over what they described as attempts to curb dissent and artistic expression.
Legal experts note that legislative privileges are intended to protect the functioning and dignity of the House, but their invocation against individuals outside the legislature often leads to complex constitutional questions involving freedom of speech.
The Privileges Committee may recommend action after reviewing Kamra’s submission and hearing arguments from both sides. Possible outcomes range from dismissal of the complaint to admonition or other measures within the House’s powers.
The development adds another chapter to the ongoing friction between political leaders and stand-up comedians, underscoring the increasingly contested space of satire in India’s political landscape.
