DEAD SEA, Jordan.
We are at a crossroads of history. The last three years have been especially violent and tragic. We haveseen great suffering inflicted on Arabs and on Israelis - much of it on innocent civilians. When I say thatArabs have suffered, I think not only of Palestinians. I think also of Iraqis. They have suffered terriblyfrom conflict, sanctions and unspeakable human rights abuses. They continue to suffer now.
As the Security Council has resolved, "the day when Iraqis govern themselves must come quickly".If we succeed in enabling them to do that, this great nation will be able to look back on 2003 as a positiveturning point in its history. And the same could be true for Israelis and Palestinians.
But when I say we are at a crossroads of history, I am not thinking only of this region. I am thinking ofthe whole world. We are at the beginning of a new century, and we don't yet know what it will be like.
As we look back at the last century, we can see two models. There is the model of the first half, whenalmost the entire planet was devastated by two world wars, and freedom everywhere was threatened by the riseof totalitarianism. Horror was heaped on horror, until we reached the Holocaust and Hiroshima.
And there is the model of the second half - which was not perfect, by any means, but was still a vastimprovement. There were atrocities, including even renewed genocide; there were many brutal wars. There wereappalling violations of human rights. And yes, there was the cold war, with its precarious balance of nuclearterror. All humanity could have perished, at almost any moment, from a single miscalculation by the leaders ofone of the super-Powers.
But, thank God, that did not happen. Overall, the second half of the twentieth century saw some incredibleprogress. The world economy not only recovered from the devastation of 1945. It expanded as never before.There were amazing technical changes. People in the industrialized world today enjoy a level of prosperity,and have access to a range of experiences, that our grandparents could not have dreamed of.
Of course, much of the developing world lags far behind. Billions of people still live in extreme anddegrading poverty. But even there, there was much good news. With improvements in education and primary healthcare, child mortality was reduced, literacy spread. The peoples of the developing world threw off the yoke ofcolonialism, and those of the Soviet bloc won political freedom. Democracy is not yet universal, but it is nowmore the norm than the exception.
Did all this happen by accident? No! It happened because, in and after 1945, a group of far-sighted leaderswere determined to make the second half of the twentieth century different from the first. They saw that thehuman race had only one world to live in, and that unless it managed its affairs more prudently, all humanbeings would suffer. Indeed, all might perish.
So, they drew up rules to govern international behavior, and they founded a network of institutions inwhich different nations could co-operate for the common good: global institutions and regional ones, technicalones and political ones, with the United Nations at the centre to bring all nations together and keep thepeace between them.
Between them, these institutions made it possible for a growing proportion of the human race to live infreedom and prosperity. The question now is, will the twenty-first century be like the first half of thetwentieth, or like the second? If it is like the first, it will be even more violent, more intolerant, andmore destructive. States and societies will close in on themselves, stamping out diversity, restricting humanrights, and refusing to accept products or people, or ideas, that come from other cultures.
New technologies, instead of improving people's lives, will make the effects of bad decisions even worse.The planet will be laid waste, and those who survive will view each other with fear and suspicion. But that isnot my "vision for a shared future". I see a different future - one that we have the power tochoose.
I see humanity building on the achievements of the second half of the twentieth century, adapting them, andcarrying them much further. Each State will look after its own people first. But where there is need, otherswill come to help. Idealism will not be scoffed at as naïve, but respected and taken seriously.
I see markets that are truly free and fair. The poor will be able to improve their lot by producing andselling, without facing trade barriers or unfairly subsidized competition. I see all peoples working togetherto care for their common home, the earth, ensuring that its riches are preserved for future generations. And Isee decisions that affect the global interest being taken in global institutions, starting with the UnitedNations. All members will respect each other's views, and strive honestly to reach agreement.
They will recognize the need for change - including change in our institutions - when new challengesrequire new responses. But they will judge the value of change by the improvements it can bring in securityand freedom, justice and prosperity for all.
We had entered the new millennium through a gate of fire - the terrorist attack on New York City inSeptember 2001. That attack was indeed a challenge. It challenged us to unite against common enemies, anddefeat them. But, even more fundamentally, it was a challenge to our common humanity, to our belief thatdiversity is a source of wealth and inspiration, and not of fear.
Advertisement
It challenged us to understand each other better, and to join hands across cultural and religious barriers.It challenged us to show generosity and vision; to make sacrifices for the sake of peace; to takeresponsibility for the fate of our fellow men and women. Let us pledge ourselves to meet that challenge.
Kofi Annan is Secretary-General of the United Nations. This is adapted from aspeech he delivered at the World Economic Forum meeting held at Dead Sea, Jordan, on June 23, 2003.Rights: © 2003 Yale Center for the Study of Globalization. YaleGlobal
