For the longest time, during my school days, Outlook was my only source for current affairs. Growing up, I have appreciated the space the magazine gives to contrarian viewpoints that are diametrically opposed to popular discourse, even though slightly bizarre. I particularly like the diary and its interesting satirical style.
I don’t think the design is particularly innovative although the features section is usually exciting to look at and extremely insightful. Still, I cannot confess to ever having read dramatic reporting on film production. But the political section I find particularly interesting. At a time when most publications are known to be pro-establishment, Outlook touches on different perspectives. At one point when the UPA government was in power, it seemed that Outlook was pro-UPA. Over UPA’s term it felt like Outlook had changed its line. The same happened with the NDA regime. At the start of their term it appeared to be pro-establishment until last year when the magazine did a hard-hitting anti-establishment piece, which was followed by corrective action from the government. While most publications swing one way, Outlook has tried to balance it out, although I would suggest it reevaluate its take and not be anti-establishment for the sake of it, saying more and more on less and less, or pro-establishment like a cheerleader, again for the sake of having a view. It is necessary to strike the right balance, offer constructive criticism.
Actress, producer and biker Gul Panag was AAP candidate from Chandigarh
Outlook invites readers to take part in its 20th anniversary celebrations. Send us your bouquets and, more importantly, your brickbats. E-mail your entry to editor [AT] outlookindia [DOT] com
