Flotsam In The Fog Of Denial

As Rob says when he goes on to describe the aftermath, “At that time, (Canadian) Prime Minister (Brian) Mulroney called the Indian Prime Minister to offer his condolences, if you will, not realising that over 70 per cent of the people on the plane were Canadians. That offends me.”

While the Canadian Government never quite took ownership of the terror attack, it wasn’t until 2006 that then Prime Minister Stephen Harper fulfilled a ­campaign promise and a Royal Commission of Inquiry probed the ­matter. The commissioner was John Major, a retired justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, and in his report ­delivered in 2010, he was blunt, “This remains the largest mass murder in Canadian history, and was the result of a cascading series of errors.”

Justice Major had heard about the bombing on his car radio that Sunday morning, and he recalls, “There was no comment that most of the passengers were Canadian.” He underscored this point in his voluminous report because, as he says, “It’s pretty clear now this was a Canadian tragedy.” The report itself states, “The Commission concludes that both the Government and the Canadian public were slow to recognise the bom­bing of Flight 182 as a Canadian issue. This reaction was no doubt ­associated with the fact that the supposed motive for the bombing was tied to alleged grievances rooted in India and Indian politics. Nevertheless, the fact that the plot was hatched and executed in Canada and that the majority of victims were Canadian citizens did not seem to have made a sufficient impression to weave this event into our shared national experience. The Commission is hopeful that its work will serve to correct that wrong.”

Harper also formally apologised to the victims’ families on behalf of the Can­a­dian government. Memorials were cons­tructed in Toronto, Vancouver, Mon­treal and Ottawa, and another in Ireland, as the debris from the wreckage of the airplane was found off the coast of that European nation. Each year, June 23 is also observed as a national day of remembrance for victims of terrorism.

However, unlike with other matters, no Canadian prime minister has formally apologised in Parliament for the failures that led to the attack. On its anniversary in 2011, the Harper ministry also instituted the Kanishka Project, a five-year “initiative, which will invest in research on pressing questions for Canada on terrorism and counter-terrorism, such as preventing and countering violent ­extremism.” That project expired last year and has not been revived by the Justin Trudeau ministry. Curiously enough, the host of research grants provided under the auspices of that project hardly included much on the cause ­behind the Kanishka bombing—Khalistani terrorism.

Indeed, that’s a fact that appears to be inconvenient for many Canadian politicians. The ruling Liberal Party of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has been accused of working with the very ­organisations that have fostered this movement in Canada, and appearing at events where Khalistani “martyrs” have been honoured. “India blundered in the way it dealt with the Golden Temple (during Operation Blue Star in 1984) and lo and behold, you now have a permanent Khalistani movement abroad in places like Canada, and it’s the second ­generation Khalistanis who occupy important positions in ­government and political parties,” says Ujjal Dosanjh, former premier of British Columbia and also a former federal cabinet minister.

Dosanjh, in fact, was originally boo­ked on the ill-fated flight ­before cancelling the reservation for personal reasons. He had never disclosed this information before he made it public in his memoir published last year. “More than 300 people had been lost to this tragedy. I didn’t want to take the focus away from the tragedy, the personal issue was irrelevant,” he says.

Jagmeet Singh is one second generation  leader whose ambiguous attitude regarding these matters, as evinced by his evasiveness concerning Parmar during the TV interview, has begun to cause concern. Ottawa-based clinician Rajiv Kalsi, who lost his 21-year-old sister Indira in that attack, says of Jagmeet ’s views, “I worry a bit about him that he’s already at that level of having some power because he’s a leader, that he might still advocate for a Sikh homeland and he shouldn’t be involved in politics in another country.”

The role of Parmar, who was killed in an encounter with Punjab police in 1992, seems fairly clear. Justice Major says, “No doubt that he was either the ­mastermind or one of the masterminds and the evidence we heard made him clearly a top person in that operation. Whether there was somebody who ­secretly gave him orders, we don’t know. What we know, Parmar was the leader.”

The retired jurist, though, believes that Jagmeet Singh was taken by surprise by the question and says he deserves the “benefit of the doubt”. Nevertheless, he asserts, “It’s so evident that Parmar should not be displayed as a hero.”

Coupled with that hero-worship is the alternative theory advanced that another investigation is required. This narrative is floated by those close to separatist groups who have also claimed the Kanishka bombing was a false flag operation und­ertaken by the Indian Government to discredit the Khalistan movement. “I think that’s just a ­camouflage, we saw no evidence of that,” Justice Major says, adding, “That was a rumour started by the militants, the Sikhs involved started that as a diversion. There was nothing  we heard that supports that.”

Dosanjh is also dismissive of this ­hypothesis: “Mainstream Canadian media throws this at you because it’s being promoted by the Khalistanis here.” Shinder Purewal, professor of political science at the Kwantlen Polytechnic University, isn’t impressed either: “We haven’t seen any proof. There are ­people who claim 9/11 was staged and we still haven’t seen any proof. These are ­conspiracy theories.”