The Centre is questioning Meta’s classification as an intermediary, arguing that its algorithms actively determine which content users see.
The government has linked the issue to scrutiny of alleged child sexual abuse material in paid Instagram advertisements.
Meta has agreed to report child-safety matters directly to India’s I4C cybercrime portal, while the legal question over its safe-harbour protection remains for the judiciary to decide.
Meta can no longer be considered a "simple intermediary" but is a "service provider" when its algorithms amplify and decide on the content visibility, government sources said on Wednesday, asserting that just as service providers have many responsibilities, the social media company must take more onus going forward.
PTI reported that the government believes Meta - the owner of Facebook and Instagram - does not have legal immunity in this situation, although the interpretation of law and the final determination rest with the judiciary.
Why Is India Questioning Meta’s Intermediary Status?
To a specific question on whether Meta loses its legal immunity in such a case, the sources maintained that it is up to the court to decide.
Ultimately, the interpretation of law is the domain of the judiciary, they pointed out.
"But we believe they do not have the immunity," PTI quoted its government sources.
Emphasising that every service provider has certain responsibilities, sources said that Meta's move now to take responsibility for content on its platform marks a significant shift in its stance in the social media space.
"Service providers have many responsibilities...once Meta has agreed to be responsible for what they have on the platform, then as the next steps, they have to start taking many more responsibilities," sources told PTI.
"Service providers have many responsibilities...once Meta has agreed to be responsible for what they have on the platform, then as the next steps, they have to start taking many more responsibilities."
What Could It Mean For Meta’s Safe Harbour?
Meta, sources said, has clearly admitted its mistake and committed to reporting child abuse content to Indian law enforcement agencies.
The government's firm position on the issue comes amid growing scrutiny of social media companies in India, and indeed globally, over concerns ranging from online addiction and mental health harms to algorithmic bias, harmful content and the role of recommendation systems in amplifying or shaping what users see.
Meta has agreed to report child safety-related matters directly to the cybercrime portal managed by the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C), as the government pushes social media platforms for stronger safeguards and greater accountability amid a crackdown on child sexual abuse material and other harmful content online.
Protecting children on digital platforms is a priority for the company, a Meta spokesperson on Tuesday said, adding that "We're committed to working with the government to ensure that the perpetrators of these crimes are held responsible".
"To collectively strengthen our efforts to combat this harm, Meta will now report child safety matters directly to the cybercrime portal managed by I4C," the Meta spokesperson had said.
Meta, headquartered in the United States, is the first major tech intermediary to commit to establishing a direct reporting pipeline to Indian law enforcement agencies. Until now, Meta has reported child safety cases to the US-based National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.
Earlier on Tuesday, government sources said that online safety of children is a "fundamental principle" for any social media platform operating in India and is absolutely "non-negotiable".
India has stepped up scrutiny of social media platforms over harmful and illegal online content, including child sexual abuse material and deepfakes.
It has issued notices to Meta over its handling of such content and recently summoned the company's global executives to India, as the Centre pressed platforms for faster takedown of harmful content and stronger safeguards - warning them, in clear terms, that failure to comply with Indian law will not be tolerated.
In July, the government slapped a notice on Meta on Child Sexual Exploitative and Abuse Material (CSEAM) in paid advertisements on Instagram.
The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) ordered Instagram to disable all ads and content promoting and facilitating access to CSEAM, and demanded a detailed explanation.
Multiple rounds of discussions with Meta's top executives followed, in which the IT Ministry made it unequivocally clear that such content constitutes a violation and cannot be covered by safe-harbour protection.
The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) issued a notice to Meta Platforms, Inc. on July 3, 2026, taking suo motu cognisance of a BBC Eye media report alleging advertisements related to Child Sexual Exploitative and Abuse Material (CSEAM).
NCPCR sought an explanation from Meta in the matter, and Meta submitted its response a week later.
NCPCR has since decided to institute a formal inquiry to determine the facts of the case. In continuation of this inquiry, it has once again summoned the Managing Director and Head of Meta India.
