National

Delhi HC Refuses To Interfere With Use Of "Khiladi" For Telegu Film Title

The Delhi High Court has rejected a plea by Akshay Kumar starrer films "Khiladi" and "Main Khiladi Tu Anari" production house seeking interference in the use of the word "Khiladi" by the film "Khiladi".

Delhi High Court
info_icon

The Delhi High Court has refused to interfere with the use of the word "Khiladi" by a Telegu film for its title, as it rejected a plea by the production house behind Akshay Kumar starrer films "Khiladi" and "Main Khiladi Tu Anari".
     
Justice Jyoti Singh dismissed the application by Venus Worldwide Entertainment alleging violation of its trademark by the makers of the Telegu movie and said although the plaintiff's 1992 "Khiladi" was a huge success, no case of any "deceptive similarity and confusion" between the two films was prima facie present.
     
"No doubt that the movie ‘KHILADI’ was a huge success and also gave a pedestal to the lead actor and earned him the sobriquet of ‘Khiladi Kumar’... but it is settled that whether or not a trademark has acquired a secondary meaning is a matter of trial and secondly, this factor cannot give a monopoly to the Plaintiff over the word ‘KHILADI’ for the purpose of claiming infringement, in the absence of registration in the word ‘KHILADI’," the court said in its recent interim order.
     
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the makers of the Telegu film, claiming that the use of the trademark ‘Khiladi' was exclusively associated with it and no one else.
     
It prayed for directions to restrain the defendants from infringing the plaintiff’s trademark.
     
The court observed that "Khiladi" was a "generic word of non-distinctive character" and in the instant matter, neither the storyline of the two films in question nor the lead cast and language were the same.
     
It was also noted that as many as 40 films and shows have been produced in various languages with the name "Khiladi" and out of those, only two were produced by the plaintiff.
     
"The sine qua non (the essential or basic condition) of an action for infringement i.e. deceptive similarity and confusion is prima facie missing in the present case and sans evidence of confusion or deceptive similarity in the device marks, at this stage a finding of infringement cannot be rendered in favour of the Plaintiff, in the absence of registration in the word ‘KHILADI’,"  it said.
     
"This court is of the view that the plaintiff has failed to make out a prima facie case in its favour and balance of convenience also does not lie in favour of the Plaintiff. Rather, the balance of convenience tilts in favour of the Defendants and it is the Defendants who will suffer irreparable loss and injury if the injunction is granted. The application is accordingly dismissed," the court ruled.
     
The defendant opposed the application and informed the court that the film was released in theatres, both in Telugu and Hindi dubbed versions, in February 2022 and was made available on OTT/Satellite Platforms later.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement