National

Supreme Court Must End 'Daily Abuse Of Law', Says P Chidambaram After Delhi Court Discharges Sharjeel Imam

A Delhi court here on Saturday discharged 11 people, including student activists Imam and Asif Iqbal Tanha, who participated in anti-CAA protests, in the 2019 Jamia Nagar violence case. The court said the 11 discharged persons were made "scapegoats" by police and that dissent has to be encouraged, not stifled.

Supreme Court
info_icon

A day after a Delhi court discharged activist Sharjeel Imam in a 2019 case, senior Congress leader P Chidambaram on Sunday said the Supreme Court should put an end to this "daily abuse of the law".

Chidambaram also said the criminal justice system that tolerates pre-trial incarceration is an affront to the Constitution. 

A Delhi court here on Saturday discharged 11 people, including student activists Imam and Asif Iqbal Tanha, who participated in anti-CAA protests, in the 2019 Jamia Nagar violence case. The court said the 11 discharged persons were made "scapegoats" by police and that dissent has to be encouraged, not stifled.

Reacting to the court order, Chidambaram tweeted, asking whether there was even prima facie evidence against the accused.

He said, "The Court's conclusion: unequivocal no. Some accused have been lodged in jail for nearly three years. Some got bail after many months.This is pre-trial incarceration," the former home minister said.

"An inept police and overzealous prosecutors are responsible for keeping citizens in jail before trial. What action will be taken against them?" Chidambaram said in a series of tweets.

Who will give back the months or years that the accused spent in jail, he asked.

Chidambaram said, "Our criminal justice system that tolerates pre-trial incarceration is an affront to the Constitution of India, especially Articles 19 and 21.The SC must put an end to this daily abuse of the law. The sooner the better...Bless the trial courts that push back against the abuse of the law and uphold liberty."

Noting that the accused were merely present at the protest site and there was no incriminating evidence against them, the court said dissent is an extension of the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression, subject to reasonable restrictions.

An FIR was lodged in connection with the violence that erupted after a clash between police and people protesting against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA) in the Jamia Nagar area here in December 2019.

Imam was accused of instigating the riots by delivering a provocative speech at the Jamia Millia Islamia University on December 13, 2019. He will continue to remain in jail as he is an accused in the larger conspiracy case of the 2020 northeast Delhi riots.

Additional Sessions Judge Arul Varma said there were admittedly scores of protesters at the site and some anti-social elements within the crowd could have created an environment of disruption and havoc.

"However, the moot question remains -- whether the accused persons herein were even prima facie complicit in taking part in that mayhem? The answer is an unequivocal no," the judge said.

(With PTI inputs)

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement