National

Junaid Lynching: Additional Advocate General Criticized By Judge For ‘Helping’ The Accused Is Linked To RSS

Advertisement

Junaid Lynching: Additional Advocate General Criticized By Judge For ‘Helping’ The Accused Is Linked To RSS
info_icon

Additional Advocate General (AAG) of Haryana, Naveen Kaushik, who allegedly helped the defence counsel in the Junaid Khan lynching case is an RSS man as per his own admission and he was among the first lawyers to be selected on the government panel when the BJP came to power in the state in 2014, reported The Indian Express.

The trial court judge hearing the lynching case had said that Kaushik was assisting the counsel of the main accused and had sought action against him.

In Faridabad lynching case, 15-year-old Junaid Khan was killed by a mob on a Mathura-bound train in June this year. The mob had attacked Junaid, his brother and two cousins while also hurling communal slurs against them

Advertisement

The Express report said that Kaushik has been associated with the RSS since his childhood and is organising secretary of the Bharatiya Bhasha Abhiyan in the north region for the last two-and-a-half years. He is also associated with the Chandigarh unit of Adhivakta Parishad, an RSS-affiliated advocates’ organization. He is considered close to the M L Khattar government in Haryana and was seen on TV debates in the run-up to 2014 state elections, speaking for the BJP.

Also, Haryana’s Political and Parliamentary Affairs Department on May 25 this year had chosen Kaushik as a member of the state-level organising committee meant for commemorating the birth centenary of the Bharatiya Jana Sangh leader Pandit Deendayal Upadhyaya, the report adds.

Advertisement

Earlier, the trial court judge had said that Kaushik was “suggesting questions to be put to the witnesses” at two hearings, on October 24 and 25.

The judge said that it is a sensitive case in which “according to prosecution case, one boy of minority community was killed during the quarrel in a train over sharing of seats with passengers of majority community after the deceased was allegedly abused on religious lines”.

On the act of the law officer, the judge said, “It amounts to professional misconduct and is against legal ethics and highly unbecoming of an Advocate, particularly because he is a Law Officer in the office of Advocate General, Haryana.”

The judge had also sought action against the officer saying a letter be written to Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh for taking up matter with the State Government, Office of Advocate General, Haryana and Bar Council of Punjab & Haryana, Chandigarh in this regard.

However, Kaushik had denied any wrong doing in the case and told the newspaper that it was “a wrong impression.” He claimed that he was only giving the provisions of law regarding Hindi language to the counsel of the accused.

The trial court had recently framed charges against Naresh Kumar among others.

Tags

Advertisement