The new privacy law may choke information
-
-
Increasingly called upon to intervene in a host of issues, the Supreme Court has become sharply divided as it passes a series of historic judgements
-
Congress and the judiciary—a crucial story that remains untold
-
-
Accounts like this are not only rare but essential. We need to know this seamy side of the law—first as anecdotal farce; then as discordant tragedy.
-
A pre-poll PM candidate hurts the polity, promotes personality cult
-
A schematic examination of Supreme Court judges, and their rivalries, takes the list till 1989, but ignores inner workings, motives and the disturbing present
-
Justice Karnan’s transgressions demanded a stern internal chastening. The Supreme Court’s use of its contempt power is worrying.
-
In a democracy, judges being disciplined by the executive is not an option because it defies the basic principle of separation of powers
-
If the Centre can function without President’s rule, surely the states too can. So why do we still have Article 356 in our Constitution?
Advertisement
Newsletter
Signup for Outlook and get curated content to your inbox everyday.