Poshan

Home »  Website »  National »  Babri Masjid Case: Section 144 of CrPC Imposed In Ayodhya Days Before Hearing Concludes

Babri Masjid Case: Section 144 of CrPC Imposed In Ayodhya Days Before Hearing Concludes

The decision comes just 4 days before the hearing in the Ayodhya Ram Janmbhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case concludes on October 17.

Babri Masjid Case: Section 144 of CrPC Imposed In Ayodhya Days Before Hearing Concludes
A view of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya in October, 1990. (PTI)
Babri Masjid Case: Section 144 of CrPC Imposed In Ayodhya Days Before Hearing Concludes
outlookindia.com
2019-10-14T08:25:54+0530

The district administration in the temple town of Ayodhya has imposed Section 144 of the CrPC -- which prohibits the assembly of more than four people in an area -- till December 10. 

The decision comes just 4 days before the hearing in the Ayodhya Ram Janmbhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case concludes on October 17. District Magistrate Anuj Kumar Jha said that the prohibitory order had been issued in anticipation of the verdict in the land dispute case and upcoming festivals.

A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, which started the day-to-day proceedings on August 6 after mediation proceedings failed to find an amicable solution to the vexatious dispute, revised the deadline to wrap up the proceedings on October 17.

Fourteen appeals have been filed in the apex court against the 2010 Allahabad High Court judgment, delivered in four civil suits, that the 2.77-acre land in Ayodhya be partitioned equally among the three parties -- the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla.

Initially, as many as five lawsuits were filed in the lower court. The first one was filed by Gopal Singh Visharad, a devotee of 'Ram Lalla', in 1950 to seek enforcement of the right to worship of Hindus at the disputed site.

In the same year, the Paramahansa Ramachandra Das had also filed the lawsuit for continuation of worship and keeping the idols under the central dome of the now-demolished disputed structure.

The plea was later withdrawn.

Later, the Nirmohi Akahara also moved the trial court in 1959 seeking management and 'shebaiti' (devotee) rights over the 2.77 acre disputed land.

Then came the lawsuit of the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Wakf Board which moved the court in 1961, claiming title right over the disputed property.

The deity, 'Ram Lalla Virajman' through next friend and former Allahabad High Court judge Deoki Nandan Agrawal, and the Janambhoomi (the birthplace) moved the lawsuit in 1989, seeking title right over the entire disputed property on the key ground that the land itself has the character of the deity and of a 'Juristic entity'.

Later, all the lawsuits were transferred to the Allahabad High Court for adjudication following the demolition of the disputed Ram Janambhoomi-Babri masjid structure on December 6, 1992, sparking communal riots in the country.

Earlier, the bench, also comprising justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S A Nazeer, had said it would wrap up the hearing by October 17, a day sooner than the earlier schedule.

Fixing the schedule for the final leg of the lengthy arguments, it had said that the Muslim side would complete the arguments on October 14 and thereafter, two days would be granted to the Hindu parties to sum up their rejoinders by October 16.

October 17 would be the last day for wrapping up the hearing when the parties will have to make the final arguments about the relief they are seeking, the court had said. The bench had earlier fixed the deadline of October 18 to conclude the hearing.

The judgment in the matter is to be pronounced by November 17, the day the Chief Justice of India will demit the office.

The apex court had on August 6 commenced day-to-day proceedings in the case as the mediation proceedings initiated to find the amicable resolution had failed.

It had taken note of the report of the three-member panel, comprising Justice FMI Kallifulla, spiritual guru and founder of the Art of Living foundation Sri Sri Ravishankar and senior advocate and renowned mediator Sriram Panchu, that mediation proceedings, which went on for about four months, did not result in any final settlement and it had to decide the matter pending before it.

(With Inputs from PTI)

Subscribe to Outlook’s Newsletter

Next Story : 'Youth Ask For Jobs, BJP Shows Them Moon': Rahul Gandhi Takes A Dig At PM Modi
Download the Outlook ​Magazines App. Six magazines, wherever you go! Play Store and App Store
THE LATEST ISSUE
CLICK IMAGE FOR CONTENTS
Online Casino Betway Banner





Advertisement
Advertisement