Interpreters Of Maladies

Two women take on ‘interpretation’ of religion

Interpreters Of Maladies
info_icon

How far can religion, rather interpretations of religious texts, govern and decide your life decisions? Two women, poles apart in many other ways, have the same answer—it can change your life, personal and public. Noorjehan Safia Niaz, co-founder of the Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan, started Sharia courts, run and managed by women, in 2013. The team successfully disposes an average of 70-80 cases annually plus an equal number of consultations. She is also fighting for the reallowing of entry for women in the sanctum of the Haji Ali Dargah, a practise that was abruptly stopped in 2012.

Whether it is oral divorce (saying talaq three times) or recovery of mehr on separation or maintenance and child custody, the Sharia law has been interpreted, much like the Haji Ali regulation, from time to time, often victimising the women. Even as she presses for codification of the law and gets women to be trained as qazis, the Sharia court that operates from a small room in Kherwadi near Bandra East station will have to do for now. “We consider ourselves equal to the All-India Muslim Personal Law Board, as both of us are NGOs. When one is clear on the values of justice and equality, upheld by the Constitution of India and the Quran, there is no fear or dilemma about what we need to do,” says Noorjehan with a quiet confidence.

Goolrukh Gupta, a Parsi married to a Hindu, confronted this “reinterpretation” of religi­ous texts and traditions when she found her friend, married to a non-Parsi, was not allowed to attend her mother’s funeral and follow rituals at the Fire Temple. Since she had always been allo­wed, she did not believe it was a prescription from religious texts. She took on the system and has been fighting the case, now in the Supreme Court, for the past 10 years. Referring to the Gujarat High Court’s decision which said a woman’s religion, once married, is that of her husband’s, Goolrukh says, “Am I a shuttle that I’d keep shifting identities? The initial decision of excommunicating happened because of increase in numbers at one point. Then when the numbers fell men were allowed but not women. I am not fighting a religious battle. I am fighting for my constitutional right as a woman. Rights which men would get, I should get.”

By Prachi Pinglay-Plumber in Mumbai

Published At:
Tags
×