Advertisement
Tuesday, Oct 26, 2021
Outlook.com
Outlook.com

Justice Arun Mishra Refuses To Recuse From Hearing Land Acquisition Case

A five-judge bench is hearing a clutch of petitions challenging the validity of provisions related to compensation in the Land Acquisition Act.

Justice Arun Mishra Refuses To Recuse From Hearing Land Acquisition Case
Justice Arun Mishra | File photo
Justice Arun Mishra Refuses To Recuse From Hearing Land Acquisition Case
outlookindia.com
2019-10-23T11:36:14+05:30

The Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected a plea seeking recusal of Justice Arun Mishra from its five-judge Constitution bench hearing pleas linked to compensation in the Land Acquisition Act case.

The five-judge bench is hearing a clutch of petitions challenging the validity of provisions related to compensation in the Land Acquisition Act. The other judges on the bench are Justices Indira Banerjee, Vineet Sharan, M.R. Shah and S. Ravindra Bhat.

Some farmer associations and individuals have registered an objection over Justice Mishra hearing the matter, and sought his recusal citing judicial propriety.

The court had earlier observed that attempts being made to recuse Justice Arun Mishra from the bench hearing pleas linked to compensation in the Land Acquisition Act case is a practice of "bench hunting which, if allowed, would destroy the institution".

Representing the petitioners, senior advocate Shyam Divan told the bench that it must look into the verdict that Justice Mishra authored.

Justice Mishra was part of the verdict in February last year, which held that acquisition of the land by a government agency cannot be overturned, if there was delay by land owners who fail to accept compensation within five years, citing pending court cases. In 2014, another verdict had ruled that land acquisition can be overturned if there is delay in accepting the compensation awarded against the acquisition.

In March 2018, the top court had said a larger bench would look into the verdicts.

Divan told the bench that in his over 100-page verdict, Justice Mishra has opined that the view taken by another bench was bad under the law. He added that a judge cannot sit over appeal of his own past verdict.

(IANS)

Advertisement

Outlook Newsletters

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Read More from Outlook

Will Aryan Khan Get Bail Today? A Timeline Of Events So Far In Drugs-On-Cruise Case

Will Aryan Khan Get Bail Today? A Timeline Of Events So Far In Drugs-On-Cruise Case

The Mumbai High Court will hear Bollywood superstar Shah Rukh Khan’s Aryan Khan’s bail petition in his arrest by the Narcotics Control Bureau on October 3.

Explainer | Why A Lawyer Is Seeking FIR Against NCB's Wankhede For 'Extortion' In Aryan Khan Drugs Case

Explainer | Why A Lawyer Is Seeking FIR Against NCB's Wankhede For 'Extortion' In Aryan Khan Drugs Case

On Monday, a lawyer approached the Mumbai police with a complaint seeking registration of an FIR against Sameer Wankhede and five others for extortion in the drugs-on-cruise case.

After PAK's T20 World Cup Win, Imran Khan Takes Bitter Dig At 'Not Civilised' India

After PAK's T20 World Cup Win, Imran Khan Takes Bitter Dig At 'Not Civilised' India

Pakistan defeated India by 10 wickets in their T20 World Cup encounter on Sunday. It was Pakistan's first-ever win over India in a World Cup match.

Amit Shah Pays Tribute To CRPF Jawans Martyred In 2019 Pulwama Attack In J&K

Amit Shah Pays Tribute To CRPF Jawans Martyred In 2019 Pulwama Attack In J&K

On his 4-day Jammu & Kashmir visit, Home Minister Amit Shah laid a floral wreath at the memorial for CRPF Jawans martyred in Pulwama attack, and has been interacting with army personnel.

Advertisement