Shashi Tharoor slammed India’s ODI team choice, calling Kuldeep Yadav’s omission “idiocy"
India lost the second ODI by 2 wickets and also lost the series
India played with three frontline seamers including fast-bowling all-round Nitish Reddy
Shashi Tharoor slammed India’s ODI team choice, calling Kuldeep Yadav’s omission “idiocy"
India lost the second ODI by 2 wickets and also lost the series
India played with three frontline seamers including fast-bowling all-round Nitish Reddy
After India's two-wicket loss to Australia in the second ODI at the Adelaide Oval on October 23, 2025, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor expressed strong disapproval over the Indian team's selection choices. Specifically, he criticized the decision to exclude spinner Kuldeep Yadav in favor of pacer Harshit Rana.
The Indian team had suffered a loss in the first ODI in Perth, and the selectors opted to retain the same playing XI for the Adelaide match, emphasizing batting depth and all-rounders. And surprisingly, the Player of the Match was awarded to Australian spinner Adam Zampa who picked up four crucial wickets in the match.
Tharoor's criticism centered on the exclusion of Kuldeep Yadav, a left-arm wrist spinner known for his match-winning abilities, especially in subcontinental conditions. He drew a comparison to Australian pacer Xavier Bartlett, who had a significant impact in the second ODI, suggesting that India's strategy of sidelining a specialist spinner in favor of additional batting options was flawed.
Many fans reminded Tharoor that Bartlett is a pacer, making it pointless to compare him with a spinner. Others suggested that Tharoor was drawing a comparison between a match-winner and a journeyman pacer, Harshit Rana, rather than between a fast bowler and a spinner.
Honestly, things could have been different if Kuldeep Yadav had played instead of Nitish Kumar Reddy. Nitish bowled only three overs, conceding 24 runs, and managed just 8 runs with the bat. In contrast, Adam Zampa took four wickets and was named Player of the Match. Kuldeep would likely have made a bigger impact than Nitish, especially with the ball.
The pitch offered little assistance for pacers during the middle overs, while Indian spinners Axar Patel and Washington Sundar did well to restrict the scoring. Kuldeep’s inclusion could have doubled that impact, given his proven wicket-taking ability and track record in similar conditions. Perhaps we’ll see that change in the next match, though it might already be a case of too little, too late.
Australia won the toss and chose to bowl first, a decision that paid off early as Indian skipper Shubman Gill and former skipper Virat Kohli were dismissed cheaply, leaving the team in a precarious position. Despite a valiant 73-run innings from Rohit Sharma, India struggled to build partnerships, finishing their innings with a modest total of 265 runs.
In response, Australia had some ups and downs during the second innings but in the end, they chased down the target with ease, securing a comfortable victory. With this win, they also sealed the three-match ODI series 2-0.
Tags