Mr. Ahirwar cited violations of Articles 14, 15, 19(1)(g), 21, and 25 of the Constitution, asserting that the practice contravenes the principles established in several landmark judgments, including Olga Tellis (1985), Indian Young Lawyers Association (2018), State of Karnataka v Appa Balu Ingale (1995), and NHRC v. State of Gujarat (2009). “Such a policy in a government-run system appears to violate the principles of equality, secularism, non-discrimination, and the right to livelihood. The complainant sought the intervention of the commission in the matter and requested urgent action,” the plea read.