Home »  Website »  Society »  Why Vinod Khanna's Right To Privacy Must Be Respected And Protected

Why Vinod Khanna's Right To Privacy Must Be Respected And Protected

The circulation of his picture on the social media, which shows the actor in an emaciated condition at a Mumbai hospital, is a veritable invasion into his personal space, to say the least

Why Vinod Khanna's Right To Privacy Must Be Respected And Protected
Why Vinod Khanna's Right To Privacy Must Be Respected And Protected
outlookindia.com
2017-04-08T13:13:04+0530

The heart-wrenching photograph of an ailing Vinod Khanna has left his admirers distressed and sparked a debate, at the same time, over violation of the right to privacy of the popular Bollywood actor.

The circulation of his picture on the social media, which shows the actor in an emaciated condition at a Mumbai hospital, is a veritable invasion into his personal space, to say the least. It has prompted his well-wishers to exhort people to desist from posting such photographs and making conjectures about his health. 

Anybody who grew up on Hindi movies in the 1970s and 1980s would know what a popular star Vinod was. With dashing looks and reasonably good histrionics, he was the quintessential hero who held his own in an era otherwise dominated by Amitabh Bachchan. 

But then, success could be so ephemeral and stardom far more transient even for those admired and idolised by the millions across the world. At 70 now, he is a pale shadow of his former self, battling for life at the hospital. Although his family as well as the hospital administration asserts that he has been recovering from severe dehydration, speculations about him being afflicted with cancer have been doing the rounds ever since his picture went viral on social media this week.

Knowing the man that Vinod is, one would assume that he would not take exception to his photograph but he too has his right to privacy, like any other celebrity. Under no circumtances should his illness turn into a spectacle in public domain. A public figure, after all, is also a human being whose individual rights must be respected and protected under all circumstances. 

Prima facie, in Vinod’s case, the photograph – if it is authentic – appears to have come not through the prying paparazzi but someone from within his close circle. And whoever has put it in public domain has not only done a grave injustice to the debonair hero but also caused unmitigated pain to his fans.

Vinod, as we know, has never taken his stardom seriously. In fact, he had made a hasty exit from the razzmatazz of the glamour world at the height of his career in the early Eighties. The second highest paid actor at the time - next only to Bachchan - he chose to bid adieu to the film industry and join his guru Osho Rajneesh’s commune at Oregon in the US.

Leaving his stardom behind, he went on to grow beard, work as a gardener and express his happiness “to see the world go by” as a commoner. He was barely in his mid-30s then. The circumstances, however, brought him back later in front of the cameras.

But then, Vinod has been an exception that way in an industry where some of his colleagues and predecessors zealously guarded their image after being terminally ill. Raaj Kumar, for one, was never seen in public after he was diagnosed with cancer. An actor with a massive fan following primarily because of his unique dialogue delivery, his death was reported only after his funeral in 1996. 

He is learnt to have instructed his family not to inform anybody about his demise  except his close friend director Chetan Anand. Raaj apparently did not want his fans to catch even a fleeting sight of him while he was locked in a losing battle against the fatal disease, and wished to leave the world with his screen image intact.

It was primarily because of this reason that the family of Dev Anand also chose to organise his low-key funeral in London where he died in 2011. Dev, the long-lasting epitome of evergreen hero, probably wanted to go that way. Feroz Khan, Vinod’s co-star in Qurbani (1980) and Dayavan (1988), also retreated into background after he was diagnosed with lung cancer. He too left quietly as none of his photographs of his terminally-ill days appeared in the public domain to dent his image of a macho, cowboy hero, .

Many actresses, too, have zealously guarded their privacy over the years. Legendary Bengal actress Suchitra Sen turned into a recluse, almost like Greta Garbo in the West, in the last two decades or so of her life. In fact, she is believed to have turned down the Dadasaheb Phalke Award, the country’s highest honour for a film personality, because she did not want to come back into the limelight which she had so assiduously shunned over the years. 

Other beautiful actresses of her generation, Sadhana and Nanda, also declined the invitation of Dev Anand to attend the premiere of their iconic film, Hum Dono (1961) in their old age when it was re-launched in colour in 2011.

The only notable exception was Rajesh Khanna who apparently had no reservation in facing the public regardless of his life-threatening ailment. The superstar of the 1970s did an advertisement for a fan brand barely a few months before he uttered his famous last words (“It’s pack-up time”) in 2012. 

It is an altogether different matter that the advertisement, which brought his deteriorating physical condition under a spotlight, broke more hearts than he ever did in his heady days of fame and superstardom. 

Next Story : Luxury, 'Comfortable Stay' On Sale For Rs 5 Lakh At Mumbai's Arthur Road Jail, Alleges Gangster
Download the Outlook ​Magazines App. Six magazines, wherever you go! Play Store and App Store
THE LATEST ISSUE
CLICK IMAGE FOR CONTENTS
Online Casino Betway Banner



Advertisement

OUTLOOK TOPICS :

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

or just type initial letters