Art & Entertainment

What's Wrong With Bismillah Khan?

Khan sahib will leave behind a legacy of irresponsibility and opportunism, and this will probably be remembered more than his own art. This is what hurts. But does any one care?

Advertisement

What's Wrong With Bismillah Khan?
info_icon

Shehnai maestro and 'Bharat Ratna' Bismillah Khan once again finds himself in the spotlight, but this timeits not about music. It is because he has been crying hoarse about his poverty and inability to take care of his large family.  The 87-year-old Khan's moans began about three months back when he asked forgovernment help citing his illness, and in the process also lambasted Prime Minister Vajpayee for not havingkept his promise of allotting a petrol pump to his grandson.

The Prime Minister immediately sent him two lakh rupees, the Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister added anotherfive lakhs and industrial houses came rushing forward with lakhs more. The Punjab Chief Minster, AmarinderSingh, who landed in Delhi on August 8 with a cheque of Rs five lakh for Bismillah Khan, is the latestaddition to this list of donors. Roughly, the Bismillah fund can now be estimated at around  25 to 30lakhs. It is difficult to say how much more it would take to fill his begging bowl.

Advertisement

All this is fine, but this whole episode while making one feel sorry, does raise some important questions.After all, what does Bismillah Khan sahib really want to do? We have been listening to his Shehnai for thepast 60-70  years, but not once  does anyone recall him performing without sufficient compensation.Year after year, concert after concert, Bismillah has always been seen on stage with his motley crowd of ten-twelvepeople. Artistically, Shehnai is very limited, and has traditionally been played on auspicious occasions. Onsuch occasions, it is understandable to have supporting players and the rest of the motley crowd but in aconcert of pure classical music, what purpose does this horde (of 14-15 these days has crossed all norms ofdecency) serve?

Advertisement

The truth is that the artist in Bismillah Khan died long ago. Which is why many in the world of  musicwere surprised when the government bestowed the 'Bharat Ratna' on him.  My intention here is not toquestion the rationale of the award, but still it is difficult to resist asking what Bismillah has done todeserve it. He has provided this huge country with not even a single shishya [disciple]. He has threesons, two of whom accompany him on the Shehnai, and the third plays the Tabla. Bismillah knows that none ofthe three has the potential to sustain himself as an independent artist. And Khan sahib wouldn't have thoughtof training a disciple from outside his family; and even if he ever did, no sign of any is to be found. Whatdoes one make out of this? Bismillah Khan performing on stage with his horde makes for a scene which is at onceludicrous and painful.

Last week he gave a Shehnai performance for MPs in the presence of President Abdul Kalam. The stage waspacked with 15 people, among them two Tabla players and one Nakkara player. A certain Soma Ghosh, who is goingaround proclaiming herself to be Khan sahib's  adopted daughter, was seated right next to him. Accordingto the official announcer, Soma is the last representative of Banaras gayaki [singing style].The 'spectacle' put up by Bismillah Khan, his three sons and one self- proclaimed adapted daughter made onewant to pull one's  hair out. Really, what has happened to Bismillah Khan? Why is he going around thenation with a begging bowl in hand and disgracing other Indian artists? And how much more would fill thebottomless well of his begging bowl? Even today, Khan sahib charges Rs five lakhs for one programme. Why is hedoing more and more programmes despite his old age and lost ability to even hit the right notes? The truth isthat he should reconcile with reality and retire. That would be suitable for him.

Advertisement

As soon as the government in independent India took upon itself to support artists, politics took over theevaluation process. Only God knows how much our MPs value or love the arts, but every year they nominate theirchosen ones and do not seem to give up till the awards or honours are granted. One might wonder what theartists awarded till now have really done for Indian art. Ravishankar has, all  his life, conned thegovernment and the public to make merry in foreign lands. Today, after being awarded 'Bharat Ratna', he seemsto be concentrating all his energies on making a starlet out of his daughter Anoushka, though no one seems toknow her name in India even now. Amjad Ali Khan can only see possibilities in his sons Aman and Ayan. Thenation has done so much for them, aren't we entitled to ask what they have done for the nation?

Advertisement

The time has come when the government, while choosing any artist for any award or felicitation in future,should take into account what that artist has done for the dissemination and development of his art form.Awards and felicitations are given to an artist for his ability to successfully pass the heritage on to thenext generation, to keep the heritage alive. But here it seems to be just the reverse. The Bismillah Khanepisode is no where near its closure. The way our politicians and industrial houses are falling over eachother to fill up Khan sahib's bowl, it seems probable that more will join the queue with bowls in hand.

Advertisement

Khan sahib will leave behind a legacy of irresponsibility and opportunism, and this will probably beremembered more than his own art. This is what hurts. But does any one care?

Translated from Outlook Saptahik, 25 August, 2003

Tags

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Advertisement

    Advertisement