August 12, 2020
Home  »  Website  »  National  »  Cabinet Approves Citizenship (Amendment) Bill. Here's All You Need To Know About It

Cabinet Approves Citizenship (Amendment) Bill. Here's All You Need To Know About It

The Citizenship (Amendment) Bill is likely to be introduced in the Parliament in the next two days. Here's all you need to know about the proposed legislation.

Google + Linkedin Whatsapp
Follow Outlook India On News
Cabinet Approves Citizenship (Amendment) Bill. Here's All You Need To Know About It
In this file photo, people in Assam protest the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill.
Cabinet Approves Citizenship (Amendment) Bill. Here's All You Need To Know About It
outlookindia.com
2019-12-04T14:46:37+05:30

The Union Cabinet on Wednesday cleared the contentious Citizenship (Amendment) Bill (CAB), which seeks to grant citizenship to non-Muslim refugees from neighbouring Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan if they faced religious persecution there.

The Bill is likely to be introduced in the Parliament in the next two days, sources told news agency PTI. Tabled first in July 2016, the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill has been a subject of controversy and discussion ever since. It was passed by the Lok Sabha in January 2019 but lapsed after it wasn't tabled in the Rajya Sabha.

The significance of the CAB has been equated with that of the nullification of Article 370 of the Indian Constitution which granted special status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir. And Defence Minister Rajnath Singh was the latest of the ministers to have drawn the parallel and underlined the Bill's "importance".

In its manifesto for the 2014 Lok Sabha elections in which the BJP came out with flying colours, the saffron party had mentioned that “India shall remain a natural home for persecuted Hindus and they shall be welcome to seek refuge here.”

What Is The Bill About?

The Bill amends the Citizenship Act, 1955 to accord eligibility to illegal Hindu, Sikh, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christian migrants from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan for Indian citizenship. It, naturally, implies that migrants, who identify themselves with any group or community other than those mentioned above, from these countries won't be eligible for citizenship.

The bill also relaxes the provisions for "Citizenship by naturalisation".

One of the requirements for citizenship by naturalisation under the act was that the applicant must have resided in India in the last 12 months, and for 11 of the previous 14 years. The proposed law reduces these 11 years to just six years for people belonging to the same six religions and three countries mentioned above.

Criticism And Concerns:

The biggest criticism of the Bill is that it grants citizenship to the people based on their religion which, many say, violates the right to equality guaranteed under Article 14 of the Indian Constitution.

The Opposition parties have objected to the Bill, with Congress even saying it will build a consensus with like-minded people to oppose it along with a nationwide National Register of Citizens. They object to the proposed legislation, saying the citizenship can't be granted solely on the basis of religion. Social activists and law experts have also alleged that the Bill was anti-Muslim, for the community's name is conspicuous by its absence in the aforementioned list of religions.

Rejecting the criticism, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh had said the three neighbouring countries were essentially Islamic nations and so it is the non-Muslims, who are at the receiving end of religious persecution there.

The Bill has encountered resistance, particularly in the north-east, where political parties, including those part of the NDA, have expressed apprehensions over the proposed law.

Assam Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma had on Sunday said a consensus had been reached during a meeting with Home Minister Amit Shah that north-east specific concerns will be taken into consideration when a fresh draft is prepared.

"No one supported the previous draft. However, leaders have agreed that if their grievances are accommodated in the new draft, they will not have any reason to oppose it," Sarma said.

The All Assam Students Union (AASU), one of the most influential organizations of the region which spearheaded six-year-long agitation known as Assam Agitation to drive out illegal migrants from the state in the 1980s, is determined to carry forward opposition to the Bill.

“We can’t accept that bill. This is against our rights and the constitution. We have already accepted the migrants from Bangladesh till 1971.

"Now, there is no scope to accept any more migrants. Apart from that, to give citizenship based on religion is against our constitution. We will continue our democratic agitation against the CAB. We always had to do that to get our rights. Now, our students will again come out on the streets to get their rights,” AASU chief adviser Samujjal Bhattacharya said.

Besides AASU, hundreds of organizations of Assam and other states have been vocally against it. North East Students Organizations (NESO), the umbrella body of all the major students’ associations of all the seven states is also in the same mode.

Krishak Mukti Sangram Samiti (KMSS), a peasants’ body, which has also been very vocal against the CAB will start a new wave of agitations from Thursday.

It’s adviser Akhil Gogoi has appealed to the people of the state to be united and oppose the bill.

It's still not clear if the new draft if there is one, addresses the concerns raised by the states in the northeast.

Last Saturday, senior Congress leader Jairam Ramesh said the BJP government was using threats and intimidation to bring other parties around the controversial bill.

"All political parties are opposed to it [Citizenship Amendment Bill and NRC] except the BJP. But we have seen what has happened in Maharashtra. I hope other allies of the BJP realise that they will be finished as long as they continue to support the BJP," Ramesh said in a press conference.

Last year at least sixteen indigenous groups of Assam had said the proposed CAB will violate the idea of secularism of the Constitution by distinguishing illegal immigrants based on religion.

The groups also said it will threaten the existence of the ethnic communities in the state.

Next Story >>
Google + Linkedin Whatsapp

The Latest Issue

Outlook Videos