CIC Slaps Rs 25,000 Fine On DU Official For Rejecting RTI Query On PM Modi's Degree

DU's CPIO rejected the RTI query stating that the Indian Postal Order (IPO) was not marked to the registrar of the University.
CIC Slaps Rs 25,000 Fine On DU Official For Rejecting RTI Query On PM Modi's Degree
CIC Slaps Rs 25,000 Fine On DU Official For Rejecting RTI Query On PM Modi's Degree
outlookindia.com
2017-01-09T13:45:34+0530

In a controversy that has been raging for a while, the Central Information Commission (CIC) is said to have slapped a fine of Rs 25,000 on Delhi University’s Central Public Information Officer for rejecting an RTI query asking about Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s graduation degree.

According to a report in The Economic Times the Chief Information Commissioner M. Sridhar Acharyulu pulled up DU’s CPIO Meenakshi Sahay, mentioning that he found her suggestions for not furbishing the information as “penny wise, pound foolish”.

Advertisement opens in new window

The plea to inquire about the PM’s degree was filed by a Delhi-based lawyer Mohammad Irsad and the application was turned away, stating that the Indian Postal Order (IPO) was not marked to the registrar of the University.

The CIC reportedly directed the “public authority” to recover the cost from Sahay’s salary, admonishing the fact that thousands of rupees had been wasted in a legal battle for a postal order that costs Rs 10.

Sahay is said to have told the CIC that she had no malice in mind while rejecting the plea  and that she was following the guidelines laid down by the University.

The CIC was scathing of the matter though, reportedly calling it “pathetic” that “such a simple request for information has been dragged to the level of second appeal, building heaps of documents with multiple files".

A day earlier, the CIC had asked the Delhi University for all the records of students who appeared for the Bachelor of Arts in the year 1978, the year that the University claims PM Modi finished his degree. The CIC had rebuffed the argument of the Central Public Information Commissioner that it was third-party personal information, saying that there was “neither merit, nor legality” in their argument. 

Post a Comment


You are not logged in, To comment please / Register
or use
Next Story : West And East Of India Meet In Hyderabad Culturescape
Download the Outlook ​Magazines App. Six magazines, wherever you go! Play Store and App Store
THE LATEST ISSUE
CLICK IMAGE FOR CONTENTS
Advertisement

OUTLOOK TOPICS :

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

or just type initial letters