- Login | Register
- Current Issue
- Most Read
- Back Issues
Housing sales fell 26 per cent in Delhi-NCR in the first half of 2017 as demand continued to be sluggish post-demonetisati
The Supreme Court today granted the last opportunity to the Maharashtra government to remove illegal encroachments o
The consumers will have to shell out more for the ready to move-in flats under the GST system as developers with large uns
The Delhi Development Authority's (DDA) much-awaited new housing scheme with 12,000 flats on offer is "almost certain" to
The Raj Thackeray-led MNS has alleged that some builders in Mumbai were not selling flats to buyers who were non-vegetaria
In a major set back to the investors of Tata Camelot Housing project, Delhi High Court today held that the project cannot
Delhi's Connaught Place is the world's 9th most expensive office location with annual prime rent of USD 105.71 per sq ft,
China has allocated a whopping USD 4.5 billion to renovate substandard urban houses in Beijing this year as part of a plan
The monthly average housing sales fell 40 per cent during November-December period in the top nine cities as customers def
In a bid to ease EMI burden by ensuring cheap home loans in rural areas, the Centre today approved 3 per cent interest sub
L'affaire Emraan Hashmi, where he said that he was denied a flat in a housing society only because he is a Muslim, is only the latest episode in the sad series of earlier such narratives. Salil Tripathi joins the debate in Mint:
If housing societies can frame rules about who can buy, can they make rules about who cannot buy? What if such exclusions are fuelled by prejudice, keeping out particular castes or faiths?
Singapore does it differently. There, the state does not want communal ghettos. So it requires that the ethnic composition in the flats it builds must be proportional—broadly—to the general population. Singapore can do it, being a city-state where four out of five Singaporeans live in government-built housing. But it is neither practical nor desirable to replicate such regimentation because it would violate an individual’s right to stay where he wants to, and another’s right to rent out property to whoever he wants.
But what if there is a persistent pattern to keep out some people? Can, or should, the state intervene...?
States keen to eliminate prejudice may want to intervene in cases of discrimination among private individuals. But look at our matrimonial ads—how can anti-discrimination laws be enforced while respecting individual freedom? That is the tough conundrum.
After recounting what the anti-Muslim hysteria has done even to the moderate Muslim mind, Hasan Saroor, writing in the Hindu, also quotes her on the old housing issue:
Ms Azmi said not long ago she was quoted as complaining that she and her husband Javed Akhtar could not find a house of their choice in Bombay because they were Muslim.
“What I had in fact said was that I was not bitter about it because discrimination happens against everyone. They edited out that sentence and I was left sounding as a bitter Muslim complaining about discrimination — and this led to a huge controversy,” she said.
Tarunabh Khaitan had done a very useful piece on the possible legal responses here.
Post Script: In fact, going over the above and finding a reference, once again, to the excellent blog Law and Other Things, I find that he too had been following the moving Kafila narratives, and has done a very thoughtful follow-up post here. Do look at the the comments section as well.