- Login | Register
- Current Issue
- Most Read
- Back Issues
An all party Parliamentary delegation is likely to visit Jammu and Kashmir in the first week of September and meet a cross
Union Home Minister Rajnath Singh today said the youths of Kashmir should pick up pens, books and computers instead of sto
An FIR was today registered against Amnesty International India in connection with alleged raising of "independence" sloga
Opposition National Conference today accused BJP of trying to divide Jammu and Kashmir regions on communal lines.
Three persons were killed and over 150 injured in fresh clashes which rocked Kashmir at several places after Friday prayer
Mastermind of the 2008 Mumbai attack, Hafiz Saeed today led a 'Kashmir Caravan' from Lahore to Islamabad and vowed to marc
In a fresh twist to the decades- old Kashmir dispute, the "president" of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir has said that
The current angst about India conceding ground by agreeing to incorporate a reference to Balochistan in the recent joint statement out of Egypt is misplaced. If India is in fact aiding and abetting rebels in Balochistan, then it is not automatically the moral equivalent of Pakistan's involvement in Jammu & Kashmir. Without getting into lengthy legalistic tangles about how the two might or might not be equivalent, the issue is as simple as right versus wrong.
Not all liberation movements are the same in a moral sense, and it follows that not all interference in a foreign liberation struggle is morally equivalent. The fight in Balochistan is about unfair exploitation of Balochi resources by Pakistan's dominant Punjabis, and about the disrespecting of Balochi language and culture. The fight in Kashmir is about the adoption, by a segment of the Muslim population there, of Pakistan's underlying supremacist ideology, usually known as the "two nation theory"...