Advertisement
X

Masters Of Losses

The Congress debacle in the states has got the knives out for its general secretaries

The crushing defeat of the Congress in the Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand elections, coupled with the debacle in Goa and Manipur, where the party was outmanoeuvred by the BJP, finds striking exp­ression in the party headquarters at 24 Akbar Road. Well-dusted rooms of leaders are empty and there is almost pin-drop silence in the corridors, broken only by lower-rung employees talking in awe about Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the BJP’s stunning victory in UP. Surprisingly, there is no mention of Rahul Gandhi. A few leaders say the Congress’s “gen­etic character” has changed and, therefore, no “surgery” can help it turn the tide in the near future. All eyes are on ailing party chief Sonia Gandhi, who is likely to ret­urn soon from her medical sojourn abroad.

Though swords are not out yet for the heir apparent, murmurs of dissent are now palpable in the coterie around him. “We sacrificed everything—status, job, family—and submitted to this rotten system in the party. For what? The family is only bothered only about itself and not the party,” says a senior leader who is not sure whether Rahul has learnt his lesson after biting the dust. “Life in the Congress will continue like this only. Rajiv Gandhi was a failure as prime minister, but when he had to face the reality in the latter phase of his life, he understood what is what—people, party workers and this country.”

Following the humiliating defeat, Kishore Chandra Deo from Andhra Pradesh, who was a minister in the UPA government, tells Outlook that some homework needs to be done and the performance of general secretaries reviewed before bestowing responsibility on them. “General secretary Ghulam Nabi Azad started the process of bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh and Digvijaya Singh, another general secretary, completed it. That was despite my telling the leadership again and again that the timing was not correct for the formation of Telangana. We should have started the process much earlier and taken the people into confidence,” he says. “In spite of all this, both Azad and Digvijaya were entrusted with more responsibilities. And now they have messed up in UP and Goa, respectively, where they were in charge. In fact, the Congress has lost all the states where a handful of leaders were given responsibility.”

In Orissa, the general secretary in-charge B.K. Hariprasad resigned after the Congress lost the panchayat elections in February. “He did so even though it was a local unit election and he was not really responsible for the defeat,” says Deo. “We need leaders who can deliver and should not continue with the old lot holding important positions and playing musical chairs among themselves. They are taking charge of state after state and losing them. This coterie business and sycophancy won’t work. We need to ensure that the leaders we select will be loyal to the party. For instance, N. Biren, who was crowned as the BJP chief minister in Manipur, was a minister in the Okram Ibobi Singh government before he joined the BJP. Himanta Biswa Sarma, a former Congressman, has messed up the Congress’s chances in the Northeast. In Andhra, at least three ministers shifted loyalty ahead of the 2014 elections. Why can’t general secretaries review the credentials of state leaders and ensure their commitment?”

Advertisement

Post-poll developments in Goa leave little room to doubt it was Digvijaya’s mismanagement that did the Congress in. It came out of the polls as the single largest party, but left the field open for the BJP to woo MLAs from smaller parties and independents. The MLAs are apparently furious, and one of them, Vishwajit Rane, abs­tained from the floor test of the Manohar Parrikar government and resigned soon after. He was among a group of party legislators who met in Panaji on the night of March 14 and reportedly discussed their ang­uish over the political scenario.

After his resignation, Rane told a news channel that he is disillusioned with the Congress and the style of functioning of those who were looking after Goa ­affairs. “They seemed to be on a holiday rather than interested in forming the government,” he said. “They are solely responsible for destroying the mandate that the people of Goa gave us.”  Some other Congress MLAs in the state also want action against those responsible for the party’s failure to form the government.

Advertisement
Photograph by Jitender Gupta

Many feel PCC presidents are also equally to be blamed for the debacles in various states. “The PCC presidents are unable to instil confidence among workers and also seem to lack will power,” says a senior leader. In UP, the Congress had targeted the youth, non-Yadav OBCs, Jats, minorities and farmers, but to no avail. Insiders feel the party failed to connect with the voters and caste became the dominant factor. The Jats voted for the BJP since they saw the Congress as a party that has been partial towards Muslims and allied with the Samajwadi Party, which is also accused of propagating “minority politics”. The party could not keep up the tempo generated during Rahul Gandhi’s Kisan Yatra and also failed to connect with the OBCs, MBCs and SCs. In other words, the Congress failed to seize the ­narrative from the BJP.

In Uttarakhand, the general secretary in-charge Ambika Soni and other senior leaders are “stunned” by the Congress defeat. They were hoping the internal turmoil in the BJP over giving tickets to Congress defectors would pull the BJP down, but the opposite happened. On the other hand, the long-standing fight between PCC president Kishore Upadhyaya and outgoing chief minister Harish Rawat took a toll on the Congress’s prospects. Looking back, insiders say action should have been taken last year against either Upadhyaya or Rawat. But the party had then refused to take action and the consequences are now on the table. “In politics, you have to be flexible,” says a senior leader, while pointing out that Congress ­rebels as well as voters showed more faith in the BJP, which did not even project any CM candidate in any of the states.

Advertisement

At the Congress headquarters in Delhi, some leaders say they have written letters to Rahul apprising him of the situation. “The revolt in UP has been simmering for the past 10-15 years,” says a leader from UP. “Leaders in the state treat the Congress as if it is their fiefdom. The alliance with the Samajw­adi Party was, in fact, the last straw. They went ahead with it after a drawing room discussion, wit­hout realising that the cadres of the two parties are not natural allies. The central leadership should realise that because of personal considerations, certain state leaders have a vested interest in keeping the party in the opposition. They should be identified and removed.”

In Punjab, Captain Amarinder Singh not only worked hard for what he had announced would be his last election, but also turned out to be quite lucky. The buzz is that the votes of BJP supporters in 20-odd seats went to the Congress as the RSS did not want the Shiromani Akali Dal or the Aam Aadmi Party to win.

Advertisement

In the northeastern state of Manipur, outgoing CM Ibobi Singh and Congress general secretary CP Joshi are being blamed for failing to handle the situation tactically. Ashad Uddin, who won from Jiribam constituency as an independent, was expected to support the Congress, but when he reached Imphal airport with another Congress leader, he was reportedly whisked away to Guwahati.“At the behest of the BJP, independent candidate Ashad Uddin has been det­ained forcefully by the CISF and flown to an unknown location,” Joshi posted on a social media site. Had Singh and Ibobi worked in tandem and kept their personal likes and dislikes aside, they could have managed the numbers.

Show comments
US