Of course, there are two ways of looking at it, and the Parsi community is sharply divided on this issue. The father-daughter duo of Sam and Lara Balsara, who are Parsis, can’t understand why so many women have taken offence. Then there is Jehangir and Simin Patel, another Parsi father-daughter pair, who’re at the other extreme. “You are going to die out if you hold on to regressive views, won’t you?” asks the senior Patel, editor of the community magazine Parsiana. “Do we have the will to survive? I don’t think so. How many more babies can Jiyo Parsi lead to, 20 in a year? That’s not going to change our demographics! If we really wanted to survive and change with the times, we would have accepted women marrying out and their children. The criticism the ads have generated could signal a shift in attitude, perhaps lead to some rethinking,” he says, hopefully. His 30-year-old daughter, Simin, a student of the social history of Parsis in colonial Mumbai at Oxford, is unmarried, and no, not in search of a Parsi boy to settle down with. She’s already being trolled on social media for protesting the campaign. “What we’re seeing—insular, regressive programmes of breeding, state-sponsored at that—is an absolute reversal of the way Parsis were a century ago. The contrast is stark and heartbreaking. Throughout history, we’ve had mixed blood through the male line. When I saw the ads, I was upset, ashamed. Is this all we can produce, to wreak paranoia, to take us back to Stone Age? How about addressing issues of tolerance instead, opening up our temples to all communities? How about talking about homosexuality within the Parsi community? How is marrying late a Parsi-specific issue? It’s happening in all communities, aross the world,” she fumes.