I don’t think there is a shortage of information. Certainly, there arestories that the press may have missed -- most notoriously, the WMDs in Iraq,but, to this day, I don’t know how we could have done a 100 percent... butmaybe 50 percent...(could have been done). It is very hard for journaliststo go in and find out, specially in a country which had WMDs and used them. It’snot that simple. Bob Woodward, Sy Hersh -- none of those people got the storycompletely. So my point is that there are plenty of sources of information withall their flaws -- the newspapers in this country are awfully good. There aredecent websites, there is a lot of nonsense, attitudinizing, and all the rest.For a lot of people the difficulty is in which thing to focus on. I think we arein a transitional period and these things will sort themselves out. What makesthe internet interesting is that it is very cheap to do. To produce The NewYork Times or Outlook magazine costs a lot of money, it isadvertising-dependent and maybe that world is in a period of shift.