When any magazine starts operating at a national level, there are certain objectives that are clearly outlined. One of them is its stand on politics. The picture painted by Outlook in its political coverage is something I don’t agree with. There’s a clear lack of a 360-degree perspective on many issues. Any comprehensive piece of news entails inputs from everyone involved in the story and a holistic view on important topics. However, Outlook magazine is oblivious to many voices. Any public institution such as a magazine or a political party needs to have a rounded approach, but when the media considers itself the arbiter of justice, it emerges biased and becomes inclined to one party or a myopic view.