38. Beena Ramani's presence as an eye witness was sought to be challenged byrecourse to the deposition of PW-46, Madan Kumar, and PW-47, Jatinder Raj, whowere employees at the Qutub Colonnade. It was argued that Madan Kumar rushed tothe spot after hearing 'goli lag gai' and saw Jessica Lal lying on thefloor. Some guests, Beena Ramani and Jatinder Raj were present there. This partof the deposition is sought to mean that Beena Ramani did not confront ManuSharma nor followed him nor asked George Mailhot to keep a watch on Manu Sharma.However, from an analysis of the testimony of PW-46, we find that he came to thespot subsequent to the fire. He did not hear the firing but heard peopleshouting 'goli lag gai'. It is then that he ran down by which time BeenaRamani must have returned to the Cafe after confronting Manu Sharma. Thiswitness certainly deposes to the presence of Beena Ramani at the spot. He alsocorroborates Beena Ramani's actions thereafter. PW-47, Jatinder Raj, has statedthat he was counting cash and was tallying the same when he heard firing of twoshots from the side of the Cafe. He saw from the gate of his office peoplecoming in and going out. At that time he saw Bena Ramani at the stairs of thecafe. He rushed towards her and both went inside the cafe. This, by itself, doesnot show that when the shots were fired, the witness was along with Beena Ramaniin the Cafe. He also came soon after Beena Ramani had come back to the Cafe.Since he was the in-charge of the cash, he would have never left the cashunattended or without securing it before running out. We, therefore, find nosubstance in the criticism that Beena Ramani was not present when the shots werefired.