Gavai argued that the Constitution prohibits courts from inserting rigid timelines for governors’ action on bills, emphasizing respect for the separation of powers.
He clarified that while timelines have been “relaxed,” the court held that governors cannot sit on bills “endlessly” and may face judicial review if there is “extreme delay.”
Gavai said the verdict maintains the balance between constitutional discretion and accountability, allowing judicial scrutiny only when inaction is prolonged, unexplained, and indefinite.