January 25, 2020
Home  »  Magazine  »  Society  » Round Two »  Sweeter Is My Case

Sweeter Is My Case

Bengal and Odisha rejoin battle over the roshogolla

Sweeter Is My Case
Hot Mouthful
The Roshogolla
Photograph by Sandipan Chatterjee
Sweeter Is My Case

A rose by any other name would smell as sweet.

—William Shakespeare

Likewise, a roshogolla, call it what you will, would taste as sweet. And so it would, had the del­ectable dessert, a moonlike orb of smooth, spongy cottage che­ese, dipped and cooked in sugar syrup, had emerged out of just any kitchen.  Yet, of late, it has been mercilessly squeezed between two sta­tes, Odisha and West Bengal, who are eng­aged in a bitter battle over ownership rights over India’s favourite sweet, each claiming its origins. And if a jubilant Bengal thought they had the last juicy bite of the stuff last year, a new development should sober the celebration.

The legal duel started in 2015, when both states applied for a Geographical Identification certification, which gra­nts trademark rights to specific regions, cultures, communities or societies as inventors of certain products or foods, with the primary objective of preventing fraud or adulteration. But the GI status has its unique cachet, imbued as it is with legacy, heredity, honour and pride. The legal patent, moreover, grants revenue advantages to the holder.

The move for GI certification was rep­ortedly triggered, then intensified, after officials and cabinet ministers of Bengal and Odisha brought the age-old fight—the tussle over competing origins is their own hundred years’ war--to the fore by public declarations of ownership. In 2015, Odisha minister Pra­dip K. Panigrahi repo­rtedly rem­arked that com­­­mittees set up by the state to probe the history of roshogolla (or rasgulla, as the rest of India calls it) conclusively proved that it originated in Odisha. Seeing its neighbour’s move as an attempt to usurp what it traditionally, if unofficially, considered its own, Bengal retaliated in a trice, putting its weight behind the house of K.C. Das, which has long been considered the inventors of the quintessential Bengali favourite. “We had historical doc­­uments to est­­ablish that my ancestor, Nabin Cha­ndra Das, created the roshogolla,” Dhiman Das, present director of the sweets comp­any tells Outlook. “And Mam­­ata Banerjee’s government gave me the support I needed in fighting claims to the contrary.”

Legend has it that Das, unsuccessful in selling traditional sweets, closed down his shop in 1864. Two years later, he started another venture in north Calcutta and  exp­erimented with recipes and perfec­ted the smooth, round, soft sweet that is the modern roshogolla. Other stories, both in Bengal and in Odisha, revolve aro­und ros­hogolla, or rugula, as it is also called.

Odisha filed a PIL demanding a rectification or removal of Bengal’s hard-won GI on roshogolla.

Since Nabin Chandra Das realised an ideal version of this sweetest of desserts in the late 19th century, Bengali ‘moiras’ (sweet-­makers) went on to experiment with hundreds of forms—from the ‘gurer’ roshogolla (where molasses replace sugar), a ‘cho­colate-flavoured’ one, to its celebrated ‘baked’ avatar. When roshogollas sta­­rted being sold in cans in the ’30s as an exportable commodity, its renown spread to the West—a conquest as satisfying as that burst of syrup in salivating mouths.

When, after a two-year-long legal tussle, Bengal won the GI rights in Nov­e­mber 2017, it claimed, amidst chest-­thu­mping celebrations, that it was just des­­­­erts for Odisha’s audacious claim. Abdul Rezzak Molla, Bengal food technology minister tells Outlook, “It is well-known that ros­hogolla is a Bengali sweet and we would fight tooth and nail to protect this legacy.” Indeed, while still on the topic of tooth, he pointed out that even Rabindranath Tag­ore had a sweet tooth and used to procure roshogollas from K.C. Das.

But Bengali triumphalism over last November’s ruling didn’t take into acc­ount the truth that the same decision was bitterly unpalatable for Odisha. Last month, another can of roshogollas was yanked open when Regional Deve­lop­ment Trust chairperson Ramesh Cha­n­dra Sahoo filed a PIL, demanding a rectification or removal of the roshogolla GI certification accorded to Bengal. Subsequently, the headquarters of the Geographical Indication Registry in Chennai has sent a notice to Bengal to respond why the recognition of ‘Banglar roshogolla’ should not be withdrawn.

Authorities here say that though the situation is somewhat (appropriately) sticky, Odisha’s claims are but sweet not­hings. “The roshogolla was Bengal’s, is Bengal’s and will remain Bengal’s,” Molla reiterates. That’s a mouthful for a sweet revenge.

By Dola Mitra in Calcutta

Next Story >>
Google + Linkedin Whatsapp

The Latest Issue

Outlook Videos