Advertisement
Wednesday, Oct 27, 2021
Outlook.com

'Reservation Is Not A Fundamental Right' -- Why Supreme Court Order Puts BJP Under Pressure

The Congress has termed abolition of reservation as an endorsement from the RSS. Even BJP allies are unhappy

'Reservation Is Not A Fundamental Right' -- Why Supreme Court Order Puts BJP Under Pressure
Photo by PTI
'Reservation Is Not A Fundamental Right' -- Why Supreme Court Order Puts BJP Under Pressure
outlookindia.com
2020-02-21T17:29:36+05:30

Nearly nine decades after the 1932 Poona pact between B.R. Ambedkar and Mahatma Gandhi that initiated reservation for backward classes, the debate on social justice is only getting shriller. In the latest, a February 7 Supreme Court order that states that reservation is not a fundamental right has sparked an intense political debate and disquiet amongst backward communities.

The top court has ruled that there is no fundamental right to reservation in appointments and promotions in public services under Articles 16(4) and 16(4A) of the Constitution. It added that it was the discretion of the governments, either at the state or Centre, to grant reservation in promotions. Constitutional exp­ert Faizan Mustafa says it is a letdown for depressed classes. “The SC judgment is disappointing as the court has overlooked judgment of the larger benches on the relationship of Article 16(1) with that of Article 16(4). Article 16 (1) talks of right to equal opportunities in jobs and prohibits discrimination only on the basis of religion,  race, caste, sex, place of birth, residence and descent. Article 16(4) says that nothing shall prevent the state from making reservation in favour of any backward class,” he says.

The case pertains to a decision by the Uttarakhand government in 2012, when the ruling Congress filled government posts without giving reservation to sche­duled caste (SC) and scheduled tribe (ST) communities. The latest ruling says that this provision is merely enabling; states may or may not make reservation.

“The court no more regards the provision in Clause 4 as an exception, treating this as an extension of Clause (1) and technically this is the correct interpretation as equality of Clause(1) is not enough to have a level playing field for the underprivileged. People historically oppressed and excluded needs a...

Advertisement

Outlook Newsletters

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Read More from Outlook

 Aryan Khan's Bail Application Today: Five New Arguments Put Up By Mukhul Rohatgi

Aryan Khan's Bail Application Today: Five New Arguments Put Up By Mukhul Rohatgi

The former Attorney General appeared for Shah Rukh Khan’s son Aryan Khan, along with his existing legal counsel comprising Satish Manishinde and Amit Desai on Monday.

Himachal: Massive Fire At Malana Village, Dozen Homes Gutted And Reduced To Ashes

Himachal: Massive Fire At Malana Village, Dozen Homes Gutted And Reduced To Ashes

Videos going viral on social media show local families in the remote, ancient village, struggling to put down the flames that erupted at around 1 am Tuesday night.

IPL Controversy: CVC Capital Under BCCI Scanner

IPL Controversy: CVC Capital Under BCCI Scanner

The BCCI on Monday named RPSG Ventures Limited and Irelia Company Pte Ltd. (CVC Capital Partners) as owners of the new IPL teams from 2022.

Pegasus Row: SC To Pronounce Its Verdict On Pleas Seeking Independent Probe Today

Pegasus Row: SC To Pronounce Its Verdict On Pleas Seeking Independent Probe Today

A Supreme Court bench had previously said it only wanted to know whether or not the Centre used the Pegasus spyware through illegal methods to allegedly snoop on citizens.

Advertisement