Opinion

How JP Movement Shaped Bihar And India’s Politics

The JP movement of the '70s birthed the careers and dynasties of several politicians. Whether the promises it made actually trickled down is another story.

Advertisement
How JP Movement Shaped Bihar And India’s Politics
info_icon

Reporter in 1972: “What’s the influence of the French Revolution?”
Zhou Enlai, premier of the People’s Republic of China: “It’s too early to say.”

When the Narendra Modi government passed the three farm bills in Parliament last year, tri­ggering widespread protests across several parts of the country, Bihar did not witness any big agi­t­a­­tion over the issue. When the Prime Minister chose to repeal them recently, there was no jubilation in the state either.

Farmers of Bihar, at best, remained indifferent towa­rds the year-long movement that had impacted the sta­tes of Punjab, Haryana, and to some extent Uttar Pradesh. They were, in fact, equally indifferent when, way back in 2006, the Nitish Kumar government had chosen to abolish the Agriculture Produce Marketing Committee (APMC) Act in the state. This time around, Nitish has sought to downplay the repeal of the farm laws, saying it is the decision of the Prime Minister.

Advertisement

In a state where Swami Sahajanand Saraswati led a storied farmers’ movement to deal a blow to the zam­in­dari system, and more recently, Loknayak Jayapra­kash Narayan (JP) spearheaded the famous Total Rev­­o­l­ution (Sampoorna Kranti) to oust the Indira Gan­dhi-led Congress government at the Centre, not only with the spontaneous support of college students but also a large section of farmers in the state, it is surprising to find such a tepid response to the latest mov­e­ment of peasants. This is despite the fact that the far­mers’ leaders have professed to have followed the Gandhian method of protests, which JP had religiously done all through his movement against the erstwhile Congress regime.

Advertisement

In fact, the JP-led movement was the biggest Gand­h­ian movement in the post-Independence era, which pav­ed the way for the installation of the first-ever non-­Congress government at the Centre, something which seemed unthinkable until the early-to-mid 1970s. And it also inspired many other subsequent mov­ements in the country. Among other things, it und­erlined the fact that a spontaneous movement by the common man, if guided by a visionary leader, had the potential to overthrow even a mighty regime thr­o­ugh democratic means.

Now, as the latest farmers’ movement failed to find echoes in Bihar, the focus has shifted back on the legacy of the JP movement in the state in the present con­text. The JP movement not only saw the emerge­n­ce of Lalu Prasad Yadav and Nitish Kum­­ar, but also many others stalwarts like Sus­hil Kumar Modi, Ram Vilas Paswan and Ravi Sha­nkar Prasad. But did the ideals of that ‘revolution’ lose relevance along the way in the very state which has been ruled by his followers over the past 30 years?

info_icon

Political experts do not think so. Patna-based economist Nawal Kishore Choudhary says if one looks at any revolution or movement in the immediate context, it would seem as if it had failed. “French Revolution was finally used by Napoleon Bonaparte, who declared himself as an emperor. French Revolution was not meant to create another emperor but it happened, and led to imperialist wars,” Choudhary tells Out­l­ook. “But some changes did take place. The thi­rd estate became powerful and it gave the last blow to feudalism with its principles of liberty, equality and fraternity.”

Advertisement

Choudhary asks: “What was the Russian Revolution all about? What’s Russia doing today? What about the Chinese Revolution, and what’s happening there today? Did Mao think of ushering in market capitalism? The way China is now pursuing an expansionist policy the world over, is akin to imperialism. Yet, can we say those revolutions failed?”

According to Choudhary, after the Total Rev­olution movement launched by JP, social emp­owerment of intermediate castes did take place in Bihar, but they were not ready to hand over power further down to the lowest sections of society. “In the name of socialism, Lalu Prasad Yadav ushered in dynastic rule and Nitish Kum­ar practised some form of autocratic rule,” he says. “However, the biggest takeaway of the JP movement is that if people want, they can cha­nge the government and also get laws repealed.”

Advertisement

Political observers also believe that the emp­owerment of people, which JP called lok shakti, has been emerging at the national level, if not in Bihar. Choudhary says any movement can’t be seen in isolation, that JP’s Sampoorna Kranti movement has contributed to the process of change. “It is always a process; sometimes it is hidden, sometimes it’s explicit. Every movem­e­nt which empowers people contributes to that,” he contends.

He, however, believes that Bihar has not witn­e­ssed any movement in recent years and the ide­als of the JP movement are nowhere to be seen today. “All leaders of Bihar who owe their political career to the JP movement are walking in a direction opposite JP’s,” he says. “JP belie­ved in social and economic transformation alo­ng socialist lines. He envisaged a corr­u­­p­­­tion-­free society in a democracy, but what do you see everywhere today? It’s not only ironic but also a betrayal of the ideals of societal change by Gan­d­hi and JP which includes economic change based on democratic principles and justice.”

Advertisement

Veteran socialist Shivanand Tiwari, however, rues the fact that people tend to analyse the JP movement on the basis of the behaviour of people who rose from it and held power in Bihar, such as Lalu Yadav, Nitish Kumar, Sushil Kumar Modi and others. “I think it is not fair,” he says.

He says the JP movement materialised beca­u­se it reflected a sense of unease in a section of society, otherwise it would not have spread on such a massive scale. “The major task after Eme­r­gency ended was to restore democracy in the country. JP got several parties dissolved to come on a common platform. After the Janata Party came to power in 1977, many constitutio­nal amendments were made to ensure that,” he says.

Incidentally, socialist icon Ram Manohar Loh­ia had given the slogan of gair-Congresswad (anti-Congressism) and worked to stitch up a front comprising both Left and Right in 1967, but they managed change of regimes only at the state level. The first change of government at the Centre took place under JP’s leadership—a big achievement in itself.

Tiwari feels the JP movement did not get eno­ugh time to bring about desired changes at the social level. “It was launched on March 18, 1974 and the emergency was imposed in June 1975,” he says. “It’s too much to expect the movement to have impacted society enough, in such a sho­rt span of time, to bring about social changes right up to the grassroots level,” he says.

Tiwari, who was associated with JP during the movement, points out that JP did try to organise those youths who had joined his movement without any prior political affiliation. The name of a youth front Chhatra Yuva Sangharsh Vah­i­ni, which emerged out of the movement, was inspired by the Mukti Vahini of Bangladesh. A meeting was also held at Acharya Rammurti’s ashram, but where was time to implement all those changes, he asks.

The former Rajya Sabha member says questi­ons are often asked about the legacy of the JP movement and also if its objectives were fulfil­led? “It is difficult to answer. What happened to Gandhi’s legacy? While declaring Nehru his suc­cessor, Gandhi had hoped he would at least talk about his work. But Nehru’s approach on subjects like society, system, development mod­el and even secularism was different from Gan­dhi’s. Gandhi worked among the people to realise his dream of a new society. But his ideas were not even included in Congress programmes,” he says. 

ALSO READ

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement