This article may please be read in continuation of the following articles bythis author:
The grenade attack in the church of Islamabad on March 17, 2002 perhaps illustrates the need for the US to realise that in its war against terrorism Musjharraf is not an asset, but a liability.
This article may please be read in continuation of the following articles bythis author:
Gen.Retreat has retreated again. In the face of mounting pressure fromPakistan's clandestine Army of Islam, headed by Gen. Mohammad Aziz Khan,Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee, and mounting terrorist violencein different parts of the country, climaxed by the grenade attack on a group ofAmerican and other foreign Christian worshippers in a church in a high securityIslamabad area on March 17, 2002, Gen.Pervez Musharraf has called off theimplementation of all the measures which he had ostensibly taken against theextremist/terrorist elements operating from Pakistani territory against Indiaand the US.
Even before the Islamabad attack, which led to the deaths of five innocentChristians, two of them the wife and daughter of a member of the staff of the USEmbassy in Islamabad, Musharraf, after the kidnapping of Daniel Pearl, the USjournalist, who was brutally killed by components of the Army of Islam, hadtotally suspended the implementation of all the anti-extremist andanti-terrorist measures which he had announced in his televised address ofJanuary 12, 2002 much to the applause of the US and other Western countries.
The retreat, which then started, is now threatening to become a rout. Not only the leaders of the mainstream Islamic parties, who were detained afterthe beginning of the US-led war in Afghanistan on October 7, 2001, but also theleaders and cadres of the various components of the Army of Islam and othersectarian and jehadi groups, who were detained before and after January12, 2002 are being released post-haste.
Assurances have been conveyed to them through intermediaries such asGen.Mohammad Aziz and Lt.Gen.Ehsanul Haq, the Director-General of theInter-Services Intelligence (ISI), that under no account would Musharraf betraythese jehadi-terrorists and weaken their capability to carry on their jehaddirected agaist India and the USA.
Musharraf's post-September volte face vis-a-vis the Taliban and the Al Qaedaand post-January 12 steps vis-a-vis the jehadi-terrorists operating fromPakistan are being projected to them in realpolitik terms, as meant to get overPakistan's serious economic difficulties and to break out of its diplomaticisolation and not as a reversal of his past policy of building up the strength and capability of the Army of Islam.
The serious difficulties faced by Musharraf, as so dramatically illustratedby the grenade attack on the worshippers in the church of Islamabad on March 17,2002 could be attributed to the following:
In marked contrast, Musharraf, known for his arrogance and over-estimation ofhis own capabilities, has gone out of his way ever since the day he seized powerto marginalise and humiliate not only the mainstream political leadership ingeneral and Nawaz Sharif, the leader of the Pakistan Muslim League (PML), and Benazir Bhutto, the leader of the Pakistan People's Party (PPP), in particular,but also the civilian bureaucracy.
He has inducted serving and retired officers of the Army as "performancemonitors" not only in all ministries of the Federal Government, but also atall levels of the provincial administration. Officers of the traditionallycivilian IB and of the Police have been forced to work under military monitors,who are much below them in rank and status and take their approval for everyaction. Abdul Sattar, the Foreign Minister, cannot post even a minorAmbassador without the approval of an Army Brigadier sitting in the ForeignOffice as "performance monitor".
The bureaucracy in general and the Police in particular have started hittingback at Musharraf -- by not passing on to him the correct information; by notgiving him the correct advice; by not enforcing law and order; by not vigorouslyinvestigationg criminal cases; by instigating the extremist and terroristelements to hit back at him; and by leaking stories to the media and publicabout Musharraf's past links with bin Laden and other terrorists.
The time has come for the US to realise that in its war against terrorismMusjharraf is not an asset, but a liability and to work determinedly for:
(The writer is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. ofIndia, and, presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai)