A movement, however incipient, has been born, a movement that's as much a protest against the general's arrogance as it is in support of Chaudhry. Lawyers countrywide are on strike, a handful of judges have resigned, as has the government's deputy attorney general, Nasir Saeed Sahikh, who said, "I cannot work in this system, particularly in the ongoing crisis."
Clearly, by refusing to succumb to Musharraf's pressure, Chaudhry has created an ever-growing territory of dissent. Politicians who met Chaudhry in the days following March 9 narrated to the media his version of what had transpired in the five-hour meeting between him and Musharraf. For instance, former law minister Syed Iftikhar Hussain Gilani told Outlook, "I met him twice at his residence and once in the court. He revealed that the president had given him two options, either to resign and the government would take care of him which meant he would be accommodated in some lucrative post, and second, to face the reference. Chaudhry told Musharraf that he would face the reference." Such stories enhanced Chaudhry's stature, turning him overnight into an example of dignity and defiance, a necessary corrective, in the form of an independent judiciary, to an authoritarian regime.
Not that Chaudhry, a son of a mere policeman in Balochistan, needed such props to enhance his stature. Popularly known as the 'people's judge', he worked overtime to clear the massive backlog of cases in the Supreme Court, never hestitating to step on the toes of the rich and the powerful. Whether it was saving a public park that was to be converted into a golf course or with ecologically aware decisions like nixing the plan to build a New Murree city, or issuing suo motu notices in favour of the poor, Chaudhry had blazed a trail for judicial activism. He even annulled the government's plan to privatise the Pakistan Steel Mills, saying the decision had been taken in "indecent haste".
But what earned him accolades from the people, and the ire of the government, was his response to those agitating outside the Supreme Court demanding to know the whereabouts of their missing relatives. Known here as "disappeared people", their numbers run into hundreds. Chaudhry asked the government to explain these disappearances. As the Friday Times wrote in its editorial, "His worst crime was his insistence on enforcing the writ of habeas corpus in favour of hundreds of persons who had been abducted by the secret agencies of the military and confined without due process of law.... This was anathema to the establishment which has got used to its unaccountable and domineering status."
Many find it bewildering why Musharraf should have taken on an independent judge such as Chaudhry. But then Musharraf had his own compulsions. Wanting to get himself elected for another term by the current electoral college (members of Parliament and the four provincial assemblies), he was apprehensive of the Supreme Court under Chaudhry admitting a possible petition asking him to renounce his uniform. Pervez Hoodbhoy, who teaches at the Quaid-e-Azam University, explains why it's crucial for Musharraf to simultaneously wear the two hats of president and chief of army staff: "Men who live by the gun are willing to die by the gun, and Musharraf is not taking chances. He knows the real threat to his power—and his life—comes from within his constituency, the military. As a result, he has become obsessed with micro-managing everything from troop movements to postings and promotions, all of which require his personal stamp of approval."
Tags