The Seesaw Saga
The Seesaw Saga
***
It’s ironical that RIL’s demand to change the terms of reference comes 20 months after RIL’s Mukesh Ambani won a high-pitched legal battle against his younger brother Anil over allocation of gas and its pricing. Mukesh then roped in the government to buttress his plea that RIL does not have any say in the matter. The Supreme Court judgement of May 7, 2010, went in his favour, with the pronouncement that gas being a national asset, “the government has the power to determine the valuation as well as the price for the purpose of the psc (production sharing contract)”.
“Why is RIL raising the price issue now, when gas production from its K-G basin block is falling? It is a brazen kind of argument to serve its own ends,” says a senior petroleum ministry source. In its arbitration notice, RIL has criticised the government gas pricing policy, saying imported gas is being contracted at higher prices by public sector agencies.
This also comes at a time when the petroleum ministry is mulling options to serve RIL an arbitration notice to penalise it for non-delivery of committed gas from the K-G D-6 block. But before the ministry could act, in November 2011, RIL served an arbitration notice. Though the ministry has asked RIL to withdraw the notice on “technical grounds”, RIL is unlikely to drop its aggressive stance. On the ministry’s future course, the senior petroleum ministry source says, “Before the first half of February, we will be serving them a notice. Ultimately, as of now, the matter will go for arbitration.”
While these legal games continue, the real battle is about trying to influence opinion on who determines the gas price—the government or the contractor? RIL had raised the issue in an indirect manner late last year: set to produce an estimated 10 mmscmd (million metric standard cubic metres per day) of gas from its two coal-bed methane blocks in Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, RIL asked the government for freedom to sell it at par with imported regassified LNG, which is sold at over $11 per million btus.
From a government point of view, leaving the pricing decision to the contractor in one case could open up a Pandora’s box: it holds implications for other exploration blocks. There would be an impact on the end price of power and fertilisers if gas gets costlier. In any case, domestic gas—be it in Qatar or the US—is priced lower than imported fuel. “The government can’t allow a price the Indian market cannot bear,” says Probir Sengupta, former petroleum secretary.
Citing the case of Amguri field in Assam, where the government cancelled the contract of the operator last year for reauctioning, Rao says there is a precedent which could be exercised if the contractor fails to keep its K-G basin production commitment. Then, Planning Commission member B.K. Chaturvedi has another idea: like the take-or-pay clause contractors often negotiate with buyers, Chaturvedi is all for government negotiating a “supply-or-pay clause” with contractors. Of course, where production is good, he also favours a slight increase in price as incentive. While these are policy issues, on which the government can deliberate, the fact is RIL is yet to deliver on its promised gas. Will the government respond befittingly?
Tags