***
***
Manmohan Singh Prime Minister
In the pre-Harshad Mehta scam days, the then FM said he does not lose any sleep over what happens in the market. But in September this year, he reacted violently to reports that thePMO was worried about the markets, apparently to boost investor confidence. The day the Sensex shed over 250 points, thePMO clarified it hadn’t held any meeting with regulators to
monitor the market.
P. Chidambaram Union Finance Minister
He resigned as the commerce minister in 1992 because of the Harshad Mehta scam. Now, he oscillates between warning the small investors and pepping up the big ones. At 7200 Sensex, he said he would be worried if it reaches 8000. At 7400, he asked the retail investors to be very cautious and said "unnecessary exuberance can lead toirrational despondency". When it crossed 8500, he lashed out against bearish sentiments as he felt the Indian corporates were performing well. At 9000, he felt it was still a good time to buy. What’ll it be at 10,000?
M. Damodaran Chairman, SEBI
In June, he found nothing very disturbing about the market. In August, a SEBI director speculated that the Sensex may touch 16000 before April 2006. A month later, theSEBI chief said he was aware of the scorching pace of the markets. Then came the over-250 points crash in the Sensex on September 22 and every regulator worked hard to calm the investors' nerves.
Y.V. Reddy Governor, RBI
Before the September 22 fall, he said the RBI was keeping a close watch on the market exposures of urban cooperative banks and even theNBFCs. Later, he just kept mum.
Rakesh Jhunjhunwala High-Networth Investor
At several fora, he has predicted the Sensex to cross 25000 over the next few years. Like a true-blue bull, he isgung-ho about corporate performances and India's future financial and economic growth.
***
The Indian promoters behave differently. At one level, they take advantage of the booming stockmarket. Several of them have floated public issues, both in domestic and foreign markets, or come out with IPOs (initial public offering) to sell a portion of their stakes in their respective firms. This way, they have amassed huge personal wealth, while a minuscule part of the money they collected from investors went to the companies' coffers. Others have cashed out totally, earning huge profits. And then there's a third segment of promoters who see this as an ideal opportunity to profitably exit from their worthless and sick companies that have no future.
But there's a set of smart—and the more serious—owners who tune their decision-making process to sing a market-friendly song. The result: investors swarm towards such stocks leading to skyrocketing prices. "Energy companies going public with massive oil and gas discoveries much before a thorough validation of their claims is a reflection of their desire to push up stock prices," says Haldea. Adds V.K. Sibal, directorate general (hydrocarbons), ministry of petroleum, who complained to SEBI about one such discovery announced by ONGC, "There has to be a system where such announcements are made to the stock exchanges before they reach the public or the investors."
Sibal also feels that both the successes (new discoveries) as well as failures (drilling of dry wells) should be made public. "Drilling is a capital-intensive operation and each well costs upwards of Rs 100 crore. So, if you drill 10-12 dry wells at a stretch (as is the case with a few quoted oilPSUs), we are talking about an expenditure of Rs 1,000-1,200 crore," he explains. In fact, because such transparency exists in the pharma sector, many Indian firms like Ranbaxy Labs have taken a beating on the exchanges.
Clearly, the stockmarket mindset cuts both ways. However, the realisation doesn't stop managements from pursuing it. "When there's so much volatility, it's possible to lose market cap quickly. We too are forced to take decisions keeping in mind short-term quarterly gains," says a senior manager in Ranbaxy. Dhirendra Kumar,CEO, Value Research, feels that thinking about the immediate impact on their stock prices have made Indian promoters more investor-friendly. "Maybe it's more rewarding for companies to look short term. Satyam Computers andDSQ Software started on a similar scale a decade ago. But one was extremely market-friendly and the other wasn't. So, while one (Satyam) has grown manifold, the other has disappeared from the horizon," he adds.
The media, analysts and investment advisors add to the hype during boom times. And this drama can be witnessed daily on TV channels during the trading sessions. One of them reported that the ONGC scrip had gone up on a particular day because it had received the insurance claim for the fire in one of its oil rigs in Bombay High. It didn't make a difference that this fact was known the day the fire occurred, almost two months ago. Similarly, a radio channel reported that the Maruti scrip had gone up because the company was expecting higher sales during the festival season (October-December 2005). It's a different story that this happens every year. Or remember how the Karnataka Bank scrip kept going up on news that it was being taken over by the Anil Ambani group, only to crash when the rumours were quashed.
In conclusion, we have a final advice: buyers beware. All around you, there are forces that are trying to subtly or directly pressurise you to buy stocks. In many cases, they are cajoling you to buy specific stocks. Maybe the Sensex will keep going northwards for another year. Maybe the India story is the greatest one. Maybe you will end up making a lot of money. But you should still take a calculated call. For, there are a lot of hyenas and jackals roaming around in bull's clothings.
By Alam Srinivas with inputs from Arindam Mukherjee, T.R. Vivek, Archana Rai in Bangalore, Paromita Shastri, and Rajesh Gajra and Saumya Roy in Mumbai
Tags