Advertisement
X

Methodology

For the 2009 <i >Outlook</i>-MDRA Survey

T
o rank the best business schools, Marketing & Development Research Associates (MDRA) designed a rigorous methodology involving all stakeholders—recruiters, faculty, and students. First, a comprehensive list of B-schools was prepared. The basic criteria: they should offer a two-year full-time management course; are recognised by the government; are at least five years old; and have minimum of three batches that have passed out. So, institutes like ISB Hyderabad (which offer a one-year MBA) were not considered. Subsequently, a panel of 18 experts from the corporate sector and academia were selected to establish the parameters and their weights for the ranking.

In the second phase, 108 recruiters in 10 cities (metros and Tier-I cities across the geographies) were contacted and asked to select and rank the top B-schools from the master list as well as those from within their zone. A list of 100 colleges was finalised for the field survey. “Satisfaction levels” on the performance of B-school graduates whom they had recruited during the past three years was also taken to prepare a “Recruiters’ Satisfaction Index”. Subsequently, trained field researchers visited 89 institutes (seven institutes refused to participate in the survey; they were not ranked) to administer structured questionnaire-based face-to-face interviews among senior faculty members (both permanent and visiting) and final year students from different streams. In all, 539 successful interviews were conducted all over the country (43 cities in 18 states).

An array of information was taken from the senior faculty and students about their institute—they also rated and appraised their institute on various sub-parameters, which included satisfaction against expectations. In a parallel exercise, an objective questionnaire was also designed and put on Outlook’s website. Then, based on the expert panel, the weights were decided for the various data inputs: ranking scores allotted by the recruiters (50 per cent), own-institute satisfaction rating by faculty and students (30 per cent), and faculty and students’ ranking of B-schools (10 per cent each).

First, the cumulative satisfaction ratings obtained from students and faculties for every sub-parameter were normalised against the highest rating obtained for that particular sub-parameter. Marks were then calculated using the weights decided by the expert panel. The ranking score given by the recruiters, faculty and students were then divided among the five parameters in proportion of the weights allotted by the experts. This total score for each institute was used to assign the final rankings.

The MBA Pie: How We Split It

Weightages
 
Placements
18.1%
Selection Process
18.7%
Personality development & industry exposure
23.1%
Academic excellence
22.7%
Infrastructure & facilities
17.4%
   
Placements 
Points
Percentage placed
49
No. of recruiters visiting campus
28
Salary offered in campus placement
29
International placements
20
Summer placements
31
Performance of placement cell
24
 
Selection Process
 
 
Type of entrance exam
105
Cutoff in entrance tests
82
 
Infrastructure and Facilities
 
Physical Infrastructure
35
Knowledge facilities
44
Residential facilities
43
Sport facilities
31
Availability of support staff
21
 
Personality Development and Industry Exposure
 
Soft skills
44
Extracurricular activities
31
Student exchange program
28
Industry interaction
47
Opportunity to try out new ideas
27
Involvement in the framing of vision and growth of the institute
24
Participation level in institutional building activities
30
 
Academic Excellence
 
Student-faculty ratio
16
Quality of permanent faculty
19
Quality of visiting faculty
22
Pedagogic process
15
Course curriculum and its relevance
16
Student’s role in institute’s research and consultancy
15
Faculty participation in seminars
10
Faculty exchange programmes
11
Research and consulting opportunities for faculty
13
Papers and books by faculty
12
Faculty interaction with industry
17
Accessibility and responsiveness of top management
11
Participation of faculty in designing of the curriculum
15
Consultation with industry in designing of curriculum
14
MDP/PhD programs
11
Emoluments to faculty
10
Advertisement
Published At:
US