Key recommendations made by intelligence agencies with the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) are:
***
Indian efforts at combating terror financing have been found inadequate by international standards. Says an intelligence official: "This is one reason why our banks like ICICI are finding it difficult to open branches in other countries. They are always refused permission on the ground that the anti-money-laundering laws in our country are not good enough, and that they cannot take chances. Most countries have become very stringent post 9/11. Funding of terrorist activities has become a major issue. India has to improve its standards."
However, this is easier said than done. Since global finance gateways like Visa and Mastercard are based overseas, they cannot be controlled by Indian laws. Notes an intelligence official: "It may not be easy to make them answerable to any intelligence agency here. In fact, that is also the problem with an international money transfer company like Western Union. We can only ask them to report transactions voluntarily. It may be difficult to make them comply legally."
Another problem that the intelligence agencies currently face is analysing the huge mass of information that the FIU receives from banks. To tackle this the FIU has signed an agreement with the account and audit firm Ernst & Young. Under the two-year contract, the firm will set up and operate a computerised system which will record and analyse all suspicious financial transactions.
With a functional and effective data processing system in place, theFIO can monitor patterns of money-laundering and terror financing. This, it is hoped, will help the FIU issue timely alerts to enforcement and intelligence agencies to combat militancy.
Tags