India’s growth story over the past fifteen years has already captured global attention. Now its construction sector is entering a decisive decade. Highways, metros, airports, industrial corridors and urban infrastructure are reshaping the country’s economic geography at a scale rarely seen before. Capital deployment is accelerating. Projects are growing larger, more complex and more geographically dispersed. Yet one of the weakest links in this expansion remains stubbornly unresolved: how work is communicated on the ground.
Despite the scale of investment, daily execution on most construction projects still runs on unregulated email inboxes, social media chat groups, disconnected task managers, spreadsheets and manual approvals. Drawings move as PDFs across multiple devices. Site updates are shared as photographs that quickly disappear under floods of unrelated messages. The gap between planning and execution continues to widen, not because of engineering limits, but because communication remains scattered, untraceable and dependent on individuals.
This is the failure point that communication-focused ERP applications are now trying to correct. Kailash Anwala, Founder & Managing Director, UniSteps Consulting Pvt highlights how communication-focused ERP applications are now trying to correct the above mentioned challenges.
Why Construction Needs More Than Traditional ERP
For decades, construction ERP systems concentrated on finance. Billing, procurement, inventory and HR functions became more structured. Accounting improved. Audits became cleaner. But the core activity that drives projects forward each day, operational communication, remained largely outside the system.
Decisions migrated to social chat applications. Approvals were routed through cluttered email chains flooded with external noise. Escalations moved through long screenshot threads that were soon buried by newer messages. None of this created a reliable or permanent project record.
The risks of this fragmentation are well established across the industry:
Critical decisions are lost when people exit projects
There is no clear accountability of who approved what and when
Execution slows because messages fail to reach the right stakeholders
Multiple versions of drawings circulate in parallel
Senior management works with delayed or partial visibility
Organisations remain dependent on individual memory rather than institutional memory
As a senior contractor involved in several EPC projects puts it succinctly, “If it is not in the system, it does not exist in a dispute.”
India’s infrastructure, real estate and EPC sectors now require far more than accounting software. They need systems that capture every conversation, instruction, task, deviation and approval inside a structured, auditable and searchable platform. Communication-first ERPs attempt to do precisely this by placing daily communication at the centre of project operations rather than at the margins.
A Market Structurally Ready for Change
Globally, the construction ERP market is projected to grow from roughly USD 4 billion in 2025 to over USD 8.4 billion by 2035. At the same time, more than 54 per cent of new ERP deployments are already cloud-based. The shift is unmistakable: from static office systems to mobile, real-time platforms designed for field execution.
India is particularly well suited to this transition. Its construction model is labour-intensive, geographically dispersed and exposed to unpredictable field conditions. Compliance expectations from clients, lenders and public agencies are rising steadily. MSME contractors, who form the backbone of day-to-day execution, face the greatest pressure to deliver speed and transparency with limited administrative capacity.
Their needs are practical rather than theoretical:
Real-time visibility into site progress
Mobile reporting of labour, materials and delays
Faster approvals without dependence on office hours
Tighter vendor and subcontractor coordination
Clear compliance trails demanded by clients and regulators
A communication-focused ERP creates a direct operational bridge between site execution and management oversight, something traditional systems were never designed to provide.
