It is not only the US and Hong Kong who have introduced such statues and forwarded regulatory clarity. Earlier, the EU, Singapore, and the UAE enacted their own frameworks to regulate stablecoins, built on similar principles but adapted to local contexts. The EU statute, for example, permits for both asset- and fiat-backed stablecoins and does not explicitly prohibit algorithmic stablecoins, as does the GENIUS Act. In contrast, the UAE allows asset- and fiat-backed stablecoins while explicitly prohibiting algorithmic models, aligning more closely with Hong Kong's Ordinance. In contrast, Singapore only allows fiat-backed stablecoins denominated in the Singapore dollar or any of the G10 countries' currencies, and algorithmic stablecoins are not permitted. These variations demonstrate how jurisdictions use the same underlying concepts while tailoring their policies to domestic financial realities. Meanwhile, China and South Korea are formulating regulations in this area. The evolution of these legal frameworks may soon provide an opening for global standard-setting bodies such as the BIS, FSB, and IMF to harmonise rules across borders and reduce regulatory arbitrage, contributing to a more cohesive set of stablecoin regulatory frameworks worldwide.