Advertisement
X

Decoding India’s Crypto Tax System: Issues, Implications & Future Reforms

India's crypto tax system imposes a 30% flat tax on gains and 1% TDS on transactions, yet challenges like offshore non-compliance and lack of set-off provisions remain. This article decodes the complexities of VDA taxation, explores the impact on liquidity, and outlines future reforms needed for a balanced regulatory framework.

India's crypto taxation landscape has become one of the closely watched policy areas in the digital finance sector. Against the backdrop of a consistently increasing crypto adoption rate and participation by millions of users in VDA transactions, the government has taken several tax measures to regularize the latter and make finances more transparent.

It is to be noted here that despite the introduction of 30% tax on crypto gains and 1% TDS on transactions, glaring gaps still exist regarding treating offshore exchanges, unmonitored trading activities, and lack of clarity over reporting by the end user. The discussion has intensified in 2025 following questions, complaints from the industry, and concerns over revenue leakages.

The article delves into the landscape: how India's tax policies work, the challenges faced by users and businesses, compliance barriers, technology gaps, and what a future-proof tax system could look like. This aims at providing a structured analysis of the crypto tax ecosystem in India and its road toward more robust and efficient regulation.

India's Current Crypto Taxation Framework

In India, taxation of VDAs is a relatively new feature that came into practice from April 2022. Efforts have been made towards bringing financial accountability and ensuring that crypto transactions do not operate extra-systemically. The current paradigm has at its core two governing sections of the Income Tax Act—Section 115BBH and Section 194S—which together create the backbone of India’s crypto tax regime.

a) 30% Tax on Crypto Gains

The flat tax rate is applied to profits generated from trading, selling, or transferring crypto assets under Section 115BBH.

Key points under Section 115BBH include:

  • No deduction except cost of acquisition

  • No set-off against other income

  • No carry-forward of losses

  • Applicable in the case of a resident or non-resident taxpayer with Indian assets.

b) 1% TDS on Crypto Transactions

The tax deducted at source on crypto transfers is governed by Section 194S, which mandates that 1% TDS must be deducted at the time of transfer of VDAs, including purchase and sale.

Important aspects under Section 194S:

  • Applies to all transactions above ₹ 50,000 annually for individuals.

  • Activity tracking and creation of transaction trails are key to

  • Applies on gross transaction value, not just gains

c) Taxation on Gifts and Transfers

Crypto received as a gift may be taxable under existing gift tax provisions and also falls under the reporting framework created by 115BBH and 194S.

While these provisions have provided a skeleton framework for the industry, they have also led to confusion and administrative burdens. The system works, but it is far from finished, with areas like offshore trading, tax reporting, and standardized compliance still to be fully realized.

Key Challenges in India’s Crypto Taxation System

The crypto tax system in India is beset with unique challenges on many counts, which emanate from the fast-changing nature of the industry. Below is an in-depth look at the key barriers to full compliance that cloud the situation for users and businesses alike.

Lack of Unified Reporting Standards

The biggest concern, however, is the complete lack of standardized reporting mechanisms. Unlike stock markets or even regulated investment platforms, crypto exchanges operate independently, with different toolsets and different formats.

Issues include:

  • Users get inconsistent histories of transactions

  • Difficulty understanding events that are liable for tax

  • Difficulty in ascertaining gains across platforms

  • No consolidated annual statements were prepared

This has also created a heavy compliance burden for taxpayers, especially active traders.

Offshore exchanges and non-compliant platforms

A huge gap in oversight exists over offshore exchanges operating in India. Despite restrictions announced in 2023 and 2024, many offshore platforms continue operations without complying with India’s Section 194S TDS obligations, meaning they deduct no TDS and do not report transactions, creating compliance gaps.

Concerns include:

  • No TDS deduction at 1%

  • No Indian tax reporting

  • No information sharing with Indian government

  • Potential revenue leakages

  • Higher risks for Indian users on account of future liabilities

Industry feedback indeed suggests that such uneven enforcement has placed compliant Indian exchanges at a disadvantage.

High TDS Rates Affecting Liquidity

The rate of 1% TDS has been a part of much discussion. While it aims at tracking the transactions, according to many traders:

  • It reduces liquidity

  • It encourages shift to offshore platforms

  • It makes compliance more complicated

  • It affects high-frequency trading

Others have suggested that a reduction to 0.01% or 0.05% strikes a balance between the needs of monitoring and efficiency.

User Awareness and Complexity in Compliance

Crypto taxation is very new for many individuals. The sector is scant with broad educational resources, therefore:

  • Misconception of the events that constitute a tax liability

  • Incorrect reporting of gains

  • TDS credit mismatch

  • Failure to file annual returns

A great number of users are unaware that even crypto-to-crypto trades represent a taxable event.

Rapid Technological Evolution Outpacing Regulation

By nature, the crypto ecosystem is fast-evolving; DeFi, staking, liquidity pools, and tokenization introduce tax scenarios that existing rules do not explicitly address.

Unclear areas include:

  • Staking rewards

  • Yield farming gains

  • Airdrop

  • NFTs

  • Play-to-earn models

This mismatch between technology and regulatory clarity contributes to uncertainty.

Comparison Table: Domestic vs. Offshore Exchanges in India

Parameter

Domestic Exchanges (India-based)

Offshore Exchanges (Non-compliant)

KYC Norms

Full Indian KYC & PAN

Often partial or minimal

TDS Deduction

Mandatory 1% TDS

No TDS deduction

Reporting to Authorities

Yes

No

Legal Standing

Fully compliant

Uncertain / unregulated

Risk to Users

Lower

Higher (future liabilities data issues)

This table highlights the uneven playing field that Indian exchanges have been raising concerns about.

Why Uniformity in Tax Enforcement Matters

Uniform enforcement of the provisions of Section 115BBH (income tax on VDA gains) and Section 194S (TDS on VDA transfers) is essential to ensure market stability and protect government revenue. When some platforms comply while others do not, users migrate to unregulated spaces, defeating the purpose of these sections.

Ensuring Market Stability

Fragmented compliance creates confusion, loopholes, and an uneven playing field. In case some platforms follow TDS and tax rules while others do not, users tend to shift to the less regulated ones. Such a shift in users has the potential to destabilize markets.

Uniform enforcement helps to maintain:

  • Fair competition: Same-set rules for all exchanges and users prevent any competitive disadvantage for platforms that comply with their tax obligations.

  • Predictable market conditions: Businesses can plan better when taxation and reporting requirements are consistent.

  • Increased investor confidence: When the users believe that the system is transparent, it is also monitored; therefore, people trust such a system and become more participatory.

Overall, clarity leads to stability, thus equal treatment within the ecosystem.

Protecting Government Revenue

Cryptocurrency transactions on offshore exchanges have often not been reported, especially when TDS is not withheld. This results in a number of problems, including:

  • Revenue loss: Legitimate tax income is lost to governments, affecting the provision of public services and financial planning.

  • Complicated tracking of transactions: In the absence of due uniform compliance, money flow is difficult to track, making tax evasion a clear probability.

  • Tax filings are incorrect: Due to the inconsistent rules across different platforms, the user could involuntarily underreport or misreport.

Effective enforcement provides an audit trail of transactions, enabling the government to accurately evaluate and collect due taxes, preventing any loss of state revenue.

Protecting Users

Uniform rules aren't just about revenue-they also protect everyday users. When all platforms operate according to the same set of rules, it diminishes the risk for users in areas such as:

  • Fraud: Unregulated platforms are more exposed to fraudulent activities and manipulation; one single set of rules diminishes that possibility.

  • Loss of funds: Clear laws and monitoring will ensure that exchanges maintain appropriate safeguards.

  • Misreporting - Clear guidelines ensure that calculations of taxes by users are more accurate.

  • Future tax disputes: When the compliance framework is predictable, then the users are less likely to face any penalties, notices, or audits later on.

A consistent regulatory structure ensures that all people, whether they are investors, traders, or newcomers, will be able to trade safely with peace of mind, rather than risking their hard-earned money in uncharted territory.

The Role of Technology in Enhancing Tax Monitoring

A modern tax system relies on strong digital infrastructure in order to keep up with fast-moving sectors like crypto. Advanced technologies will allow India to make tax compliance easier and more accurate for both users and regulators in a more transparent way. It is not about creating extra burden but building an ecosystem where reporting gets automated, and fraud becomes difficult.

Blockchain Analytics Tools

Global regulators are already using blockchain analytics tools to track the movement of digital assets. It allows authorities to analyze blockchain data in a structured manner. Their contribution could be described as:

  • Transfer tracking: Although blockchains are pseudonymous, transactions are written immutably on the chain. Analytics tools can track the flow of funds between wallets.

  • Wallet clustering: Many tools can identify the possibility of multiple addresses belonging to a single user or entity and can cluster them for easier monitoring.

  • Flag suspicious activity: this could be unusual transaction patterns, mixing services, or fast movement of funds.

  • Provide transparency: Regulators can gain better insight into on-chain activities without compromising user privacy.

Thus, by integrating such tools, the authorities can increase compliance and decrease the probable instance of tax evasion or crimes.

Real-time Data Dashboards for Exchanges

A standardized reporting dashboard would provide the following capabilities to exchanges for sharing data with tax authorities in real time or at periodic intervals. It would make the following processes easier:

  • TDS reporting: Automated deduction and immediate reporting minimize errors and delays.

  • Transaction tracking: The regulators trace trading volumes, withdrawals, and deposits in a streamlined manner.

  • Data submission: The exchanges are allowed to upload the required information in a uniform format, reducing manual work.

This also reduces human errors, accelerates compliance processes, and enables the government to keep track of what is actually going on across various platforms.

PAN-Based Automated Reconciliation

Now, linking crypto transactions with PAN numbers will allow tax authorities to match the trading activity directly with a user's tax records. It therefore helps:

  • Ensure that individuals correctly report their gains

  • Determine differences between actual activity and income reporting

  • Ease the filing process for taxpayers

Automated reconciliation makes the filing of taxes easier for its user base while lessening the administrative burden of a regulator.

Compliance Made Easy

On the one hand, to support the increase in crypto participants, India can encourage exchanges to implement intrinsic compliance tools that will reduce user confusion. These can include:

  • Annual tax reports: A single downloadable file summarising all trading activity for the financial year.

  • Profit-loss calculators: automatically calculate gains/losses, thus saving users from manually doing so.

  • Auto-filled TDS statements: Documents that make reporting easier by highlighting the TDS deducted on various transactions.

These tools become particularly helpful for energetic traders dealing in high volumes of transactions and make tax compliance less painful, more accurate.

How a Future-Proof Crypto Tax Framework Might Look

To establish a sustainable, long-term crypto taxation system, India will require a structure that is clear, adaptable, and aligned with global best practices. A future-proof framework ensures that the tax system remains reasonable, predictable, and easy to follow as the crypto industry evolves: new assets, new use cases, and new risks.

Clear Definitions for All Crypto Activities

Of all the puzzles that dominate crypto taxation, there is the understanding of what constitutes a taxable event. Crypto involves several activities that do not exist in traditional finance, each requiring clarity.

A sound framework should define activities such as:

  • Staking - The method of earning rewards by locking or validating tokens.

  • Airdrops: Free tokens that may be considered as income

  • Farming rewards — Tokens that can be acquired by liquidity providing or yield farming.

  • NFT sales: Profits derived from the sale of digital collectibles.

  • Gaming tokens: in-game items that have some real-world value

  • Cross-chain transfers: The movement of assets between blockchains that may or may not trigger taxes.

Clear definitions help the determination of when the tax applies, what type of tax is applicable, and how users report the activity. This reduces confusion and prevents disputes later.

Rationalised TDS Rates

Currently, India levies 1% TDS on crypto trades, which many in the industry believe is too high. This affects high-value transactions and also pushes users to offshore platforms.

A rational, lower rate could:

  • Improve liquidity: More active users would trade, therefore helping to improve market depth.

  • Support compliant exchanges – Indian platforms would immediately become more competitive

  • Reduce offshore migration: Low TDS removes the incentive to trade offshore from India.

Industry bodies, therefore, recommend 0.01-0.05% as a practical range. This is an excellent balance for the government to continue receiving data without hurting the trading volumes.

International Data-Sharing Agreements

Crypto is global, and users regularly trade across jurisdictions. Without international cooperation, it's exceptionally tough to monitor this activity offshore.

Improvement of oversight can be done by India together with the international world through:

  • Offshore trading monitoring: track crypto-activity that takes place outside of domestic exchanges.

  • Cross-border Flow: Knowing the cross-border flows means understanding how money moves between countries.

  • Enhanced oversight to stop tax evasion and fraud, regulatory gaps

Most countries already participate in such agreements. Joining them would help India create a more transparent and compliant ecosystem.

A Centralised VDA Reporting Portal

It is possible to significantly reduce errors in reporting and simplify compliance by having a dedicated reporting portal, as exists in India today in the form of an Annual Information Statement.

Such a portal could:

  • Consolidation of user activities: various exchanges upload data in one place.

  • Display TDS collected: The user can see directly how much tax was deducted.

  • Show crypto profit and losses: This will help in filing taxes more accurately.

Balanced Policy Integration

Crypto taxation cannot exist in isolation. It needs to work in concert with other policy areas, all part of creating a safe, transparent environment.

The full framework should evolve with:

  • Guidelines for consumer protection: to protect users from fraudulent and misleading actions.

  • Exchange licensing norms: Clear rules on who can operate and under what conditions

  • AML rules: prevent the abuse of digital assets.

  • Technology-based verification: automated means of watching for and preventing evasion

A balanced approach ensures that the ecosystem grows responsibly, with effective risk considerations.

Steps India Can Take to Improve Crypto Tax Compliance

Key steps India could consider going forward are:

  • Standardise reporting formats for activities taxable under Section 115BBH

  • Strict enforcement of Section 194S on offshore platforms

  • Reduce TDS rates for better liquidity

  • Introduce comprehensive regulations around new crypto activities

  • Blockchain analytics for monitoring.

  • Establish user education programs

  • Co-operate with international regulators

  • Taxation of NFTs, staking and DeFi should be better clarified.

These steps would create a more accountable and user-friendly crypto tax ecosystem.

Impact of Evolving Tax Rules on Users and Exchanges

As crypto tax regulations mature, so do the ways that users and exchanges go about their operations. The new rules open opportunities that come with new responsibilities. Understanding such an impact helps each stakeholder be better prepared.

For Users

Benefits

  • Better clarity: Clearer rules on taxation help users understand precisely when taxes are payable, what constitutes a taxable event, and how gains should be calculated. This removes any guesswork, reducing anxiety at the time of filing returns.

  • Lower confusion in compliance: When the rules are clearly defined across all platforms, users don't have to compare different interpretations or report inconsistently. It simply eases the whole compliance process.

  • Reduced future risk of reassessment tax-a proper reported uniform system means fewer chances that a notice, reassessment, and penalties will be forwarded in the coming days. Users can operate with greater confidence.

  • Increased security in selecting compliant platforms: With stricter tax rules, licensed exchanges would more likely stick to security and operational standards, thus offering better protection for the users against fraud, mismanagement, and insecure platforms.

Challenges

  • Learning curve: Most of the new or changing rules in taxation force the users to learn elementary principles of crypto taxation. For complete beginners, these may be overwhelming. This is something to which adaptation will take greater time and effort.

  • Record-keeping responsibilities: For every trade, a user has to keep a record of all the transactions made, calculate gain, and keep proof. The responsibility of storing and organizing data increases with increased activity.

For Exchanges

Advantages

  • Fair competition: where all exchanges play by the same rules, no platform can enjoy an unfair advantage by failing to observe regulatory requirements. This engenders fair competition and raises the quality of the market as a whole. Operating environment predictability: Because of this, exchanges have clear guidelines about taxation, are able to plan business strategy and manage all the compliance processes, and make long-term decisions without regulatory uncertainty.

  • Innovate within the rule of law: Stable regulations mean that exchanges can innovate with new products, services, and technologies with confidence, knowing their offerings remain within the rule of law.

Challenges

  • Cost of compliance: The implementation of the tax reporting system, compliance teams, and observation of legal binding will raise the operation cost, especially for small exchanges.

  • Need for more sophisticated reporting technology: Exchanges will need to upgrade their systems in line with regulatory expectations for TDS reporting, along with greater detail on user activity logs, analytics tools, and safe data-sharing mechanisms. In principle, all this means increased investment in technology and infrastructure.

Conclusion

The crypto tax environment of India is evolving, full of both promise and complexity. On one hand, the country has indeed made rapid progress by establishing a broad-based tax framework, while on the other, some challenges persist: uneven enforcement of laws, offshore non-compliance, high TDS rates, and a general lack of complete clarity on fast-emerging crypto use cases. It demands a balanced approach: integrating technology-driven monitoring, rationalized tax rates, global coordination, and user education. As the ecosystem matures, India can create a transparent, efficient, and growth-oriented crypto tax system that supports innovation while safeguarding the country's financial integrity. The journey of compliance is not merely a dry legal requirement; it is, in fact, the foundational step toward making India a responsible and forward-looking player in the global digital asset economy.

FAQs

1. How is crypto taxed in India currently?

Crypto gains are taxed at 30%, and a 1% TDS is deducted on transactions. No deductions or loss set-offs are allowed except cost of acquisition.

2. Is TDS applicable on every crypto transaction?

Yes, in most cases. Exchanges deduct TDS on trades exceeding annual thresholds.

3. Are offshore crypto exchanges legal in India?

They may operate, but many do not comply with Indian tax laws, especially TDS rules. Using such platforms may involve future risks for users.

4. Are NFT transactions taxable?

Yes, NFTs fall under the definition of virtual digital assets and may be taxed similarly to cryptocurrencies.

5. Is staking income taxable in India?

India has not issued detailed guidance yet, but staking rewards may be treated as income

Published At:
US