"We've a vast tradition of nude pictorial depiction. In fact, it's what we study."Vivan Sundaram
***
Protests against the student's arrest and the suspension of the dean were held simultaneously in ten cities on May 14. Members of the public, including artists and activists, gathered to assert the right to free speech and expression, as well as an artist's licence to sample from and extend tradition. Artist Vivan Sundaram, an MSU alumnus himself, was among those who addressed the Delhi protesters. He later told Outlook, "We have a vast and graphic tradition of nude and erotic sculpture and pictorial representation. When I was a student there, we had hundreds of plates made of these images. It's what we studied. All artists begin from tradition."
Folk artists are equally incredulous. "I told the story to a group I work with, including Kalamkari and Patachitra artisans who spend their life making iconic images of Hindu gods and goddesses," says Laila Tyabji, chairperson of Dastkar, a society for craftspeople. "One explained that the depiction of love in painting and sculpture is 'an expression of the cosmic life force, not pornography', while the other said 'goddesses have only been clothed since the advent of movies and TV serials'." Artist Anjolie Ela Menon made a similar observation: "It is only since Raja Ravi Varma started clothing gods and goddesses in the vestments of his own times that the prevailing sense of prudery began to take root."
So, while experts unanimously condemn the VHP's brute censorship, they also believe there are limits to artistic licence, defined by ethics and the artistic tradition, rather than the opinions of a religious fringe. And even if these limits are not heeded, there is place for criticism and correction. "A young person's art—I won't say it's great art—but we must allow students to explore, to make mistakes, that's how every generation finds new forms of expression," says art historian Shobita Punja. Adds artist Jehangir Sabavala: "It was for his professors and examiners to judge the work of this young artist, not for someone to barge in from outside and push him into jail. It's all heavily politicised."
"Criticism should be the domain of enlightened people," agrees Pande, adding, "possibly the judiciary." Or more appropriately, the professional critics, teachers and historians of art, who have been trained to understand our artistic tradition and to know when an artist has deviated from it.
"Our problem is that we have thousands of artists, and no critics," Khanna laments. "We need strong critics who are educated, cultivated and sensitised to their roots." Until then, the monopoly on art criticism seems to be in the grip of the least cultivated among us—politicians and goons.
Tags