The most apt description that I have read of Outlook is by Arun Shourie who called it the “new pallbearer of secularism”. He supplied the description for my own views about the magazine. I’ve been reading Outlook almost since its inception, and one thing you cannot fault it for is inconsistency. It has been consistently pseudo-secular, a label which its founder-editor himself says he wears with pride. And its pseudo-secularism has been as brazen as it has been consistent over the years.