points out the glaring absence of a body at the highest level that could provide direction to the agencies on what intelligence they have to gather and evaluate their work;
is aghast at the complete lack of coordination, cooperation and sharing of intelligence between different agencies;
points to the pervasive unhappiness among those whom the agencies serve.Neither do recipients of intelligence information tell their requirements to the agencies.
declares emphatically that the ability to gather intelligence from people has degraded;
remarks at the absence of a process that would ensure the agencies are working in the interest of the nation, but doesn't make any specific proposal in this regard;
urges a proper process to brief the political leadership;
suggests streamlining and rationalising the sharing of built-up assets for cutting down costs;
advises ironing out of glitches in sharing technical intelligence outputs;
provides the texts of formal charters for the RAW, IB and the newly set-up Defence Intelligence Agency. The charters, a token genuflection to accountability, attempt to strike a balance between the role of the organisation and the operational latitude necessary for their activities;
frowns upon the lack of any quality control at the entry level in the profession; it recommends a better working environment and a policy of rewarding the deserving; and
wants RAW's Science and Technology division to be strengthened, both in terms of technology and manpower.