Instead, the party tried to project a moderate image, giving an impression that Kashi and Mathura were the VHPs domain, by more or less identifying the party with the controversial theory of "social engineering". The strategy, still at a formative stage, would mean promoting socio-educationally backward and oppressed sections of society as a "must for social harmony". If this is implemented, the party would not be so dependent on its traditional Brahmin-Bania base and could instead lure UF and BSP supporters. This would also lead to structural changes in the BJP organisation in terms of the composition of the leadership and next years elections for a new party president. So, overall the Centres move in Uttar Pradesh seems to have done the BJP more good than harm. The authoritarianism label that the BJP wants to hurl at the UF could stick if the Assembly is dissolved. And though Congress President Sitaram Kesri was at last able to bring the UF, BSP and Congress together in the elections to the Rajya Sabha from the state, it is still doubtful whether the three will agree to form a government. If they do not offer an alternative to the BJP and insist on extending Central rule rather than inviting the single largest party it would hand the BJP a victory even in its defeat.