What is wrong with the OSA?
***

However, on September 26, when Singh's application for anticipatory bail came up for hearing, the court refused to accept the CBI's contention that he had jeopardised national secrets in any manner. Singh got bail and the CBI can arrest him only after it had presented an application supported by evidence. While the CBI sets out to gather "evidence" against Singh under the OSA, described by most legal experts as a "draconian" act, many intelligence officials told Outlook that there is nothing secret in the book. Clearly, Singh's revelations have ruffled the powers-that-be in RAW. Instead of taking cognisance of of the concerns raised by Singh, the government has decided to nail him.
According to insiders, it all points to personal vendetta. And Singh did not pull any punches. For instance, he cites the case of a senior officer going on leave without authorisation to protest being overlooked for promotion. According to CBI sources, the officer is none other than the present RAW chief, Ashok Chaturvedi. It is a fact that he had gone on leave when Amber Sen was promoted as special secretary ahead of him. After several months on leave, Chaturvedi was promoted and subsequently took over as chief in February this year.
Sources also told Outlook that the government was upset with Singh's revelation that a communication system meant for the PM's security was bought from a private company bypassing mandatory procurement rules. Ironically, RAW, the department which pressed for action against Singh, and the investigating agency CBI, both report to the PM.
Maj Gen V.K. Singh is the latest in the line of people to be targeted under the OSA. The law, which is heavily loaded against the accused, is usually invoked whenever the state wishes to settle scores or rein in whistleblowers. Here are some examples:
Tags