Citizen indifference changed to interest and involvement after the disastrous Mumbai floods of 2006; citizens’ groups campaigned for open spaces, pavements, efficient garbage removal, and against encroachments and potholed-roads. The Advanced Locality Management concept, where such groups partnered with civic officials, helped. And, D’Souza’s lament that an individual, however well-intentioned, is powerless against politicians worked. In the run-up to this election, at least four major citizen platforms emerged: ‘Mumbai 227’, which fielded 70 candidates, Loksatta Party, Mumbai Nagrik Satta, and Mumbai Nagrik Manch. Besides, there were Independents.
The groups held workshops to groom candidates, devised strategies to counter political parties. But they differed in their approach to selecting candidates. As a result, in at least ten seats, candidates of two such groups are facing each other. “Though we had all initially agreed not to compete against one another, it has happened. The only beneficiary will be a political party as apolitical citizens get divided,” rues Hansel D’Souza of Mumbai Nagrik Manch. However, Adolf D’Souza, who was with Mumbai 227, but split to form his own Mumbai Nagrik Satta, believes this is a positive trend: “It’s good that so many are coming out to fight elections. There may be fewer citizen versus citizen contests after withdrawals.”
Tags