Suspecting a deep-rooted conspiracy, Sushil said that trials against Shahabuddin in all cases except one had stopped for the past three years, which helped his cause. “Shahabuddin had moved the Siwan court three years ago under the Legal Aid Authority Act, pleading for the appointment of a lawyer on his behalf, claiming he was not in a financial position to afford anybody to fight his case,” he says. “Even though his wife had declared her assets to be worth Rs 8-9 crore in the affidavit filed with her nomination papers in the 2009 general elections, he got a lawyer of his choice. When the Siwan district administration challenged the order, the Patna High Court stayed it and directed authorities to ensure Shahabuddin’s presence in the court. But the copy of the same order, which was sent through registered post, was not delivered to the accused for the past three years, even though he was lodged in the jail,” alleges Sushil. “The resultant delay in the commencement of trial in the Roshan killing case, despite the high court directive in February this year to conclude it in three months, helped him obtain bail.”