"The only positive outcome of the current fighting is that it could turn out to be a catalyst for the peace process. There's a view that the ltte won't enter into any serious negotiations until they're in control of Jaffna. Were this to be the outcome of the current fighting, international pressure too could be brought to bear on the ltte to enter into talks. As for the government, the argument may well be made that in territorial terms, the situation has reverted to what it was in '94. But it's clear that for both sides, any decisive result on the ground will be temporary unless it's followed by progress on the political front," says Dr Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu, executive director, Centre for Policy Alternatives. But sceptics feel otherwise. "The ltte has never been seriously interested in anything other than Eelam. For them talks are a tactical move to regroup and re-arm," says Dharmalingham Sidharthan, leader of the People's Liberation Organisation for Tamil Eelam (plote). Indeed, the four previous attempts at a settlement lasted less than three months. And when fighting resumed each time, it was with a renewed ferocity. But as Sidharthan points out, "The crucial difference between the current fighting in Jaffna and other battles in the past is that now, after the fall of the Elephant Pass, the Tamils feel a separate state is achievable by military means."