The people of the Northern Areas are denied representation in the Federal Parliament and the local electedbody, called Northern Areas Legislative Council (NALC), has no powers even comparable to that of a municipalbody in a Pakistani city. Although elections to the NALC were held under the military regime in 2000,financial and legislative powers are yet to be delegated to the NALC.
Amidst the lack of civil and political rights, many movements articulating dissent have emerged. The lack ofpolitical representation has fueled demands for both formal inclusion within the Pakistani state and forself-determination. In 1988, there was sectarian unrest in Gilgit after Shias demanded an independent state.However, the Pakistani army suppressed the revolt, allegedly with the assistance of armed Sunni tribesmen froma neighboring province.
The absence of a politics of criticism has dominated the Northern Areas' historiography. Freedom ofassociation and assembly is restricted. Political parties advocating either self-rule or greater politicalrepresentation within Pakistan have, more often than not, found their leaders being subjected to arbitraryarrest and long prison terms. One such formation, the Balawaristan National Front (BNF), estimated in 2003that more than 70 individuals are facing sedition or treason cases as a result of their political activities.BNF leader Abdul Hamid Khan, while referring to the region as 'the heart of darkness', notes that politicaland administrative circumstances in NA - with total control exercised by Islamabad through the Army, with nopopular freedoms or rights, and tight censorship of all information flows - make the region an ideal andsecret place for the relocation of the dislocated hub of international terrorism.
Pakistan's military regime is apprehensive of a geographical spread of the sectarian cauldron, with the possibility of outlawed groups like the Sunni Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ) and the Shia Sipah-e-Mohammed Pakistan (SMP) fishing in troubled waters in the NA. Earlier, in February 2004, Islamist extremists had destroyed at least nine schools in Diamer. Many in NA believe that the schools were possibly targeted because they are foreign funded. Mir Aman, resident editor of the Kunjarab Times International, a Gilgit newspaper, said that, as these schools began to attract students, "enrollment in madrassas [seminaries] started declining and the fundamentalists took that as a threat to their value system. The people in this backward area are very religious and female education is considered a waste."
During the same month, the Federal Government had cracked down on an unnamed group led by Maulvi Shahzada Khan in NA for its alleged involvement in terrorist activities. Reportedly involved in bomb blasts and firing at Social Action Programme school buildings in the NA, the group is linked to the Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), Tehreek-e-Nafaz-e-Shariat-e-Mohammadi (TNSM) and other banned Sunni Jehadi organisations. Intelligence sources quoted in a Daily Times report of February 25 said that the group played a leading role during the 'invasion' of Shia localities by an armed tribal force in Gilgit in 1988. Being strategically vital to Islamabad's Kashmir policy, the military regime can ill-afford another violent front being unlocked, as it is already beleaguered on the Afghan border, Karachi, Baluchistan and the North West Frontier Province.
The problems over the syllabus and school curricula currently being encountered in Gilgit and elsewhere inPakistan, are largely the product of a state endeavour to support a particular variant of Islam. The veryconverse of 'enlightened moderation' is being vigorously propounded by what an official of the Curriculum Wingsaid is a 'powerful lobby' of ultra-Islamists who follow the Wahabi school of thought. To be fair to themilitary regime, however, a separate curriculum for the Shias is unlikely to provide a solution given that itwould only further aggravate sectarianism. The roots of the problem lie in the Pakistani state'spre-occupation with the entire process of Islamization, as also in the 'disengagement' of the Northern Areas,a region that remains deeply neglected, exploited and that has been denied a clear political identity. Theresulting ground reality is that the region is a tinderbox and the syllabus issue may well be the spark thatsets it aflame.