I am delighted to be amongst you today at the World Affairs Council, Los Angeles, and to have thisopportunity to share a few thoughts with such a distinguished gathering.
I am especially pleased that I have been able to come to the West Coast during my current visit to your greatcountry. The West Coast of the United States is a testimony both to the immense diversity of your country andto the distinctive strengths of its diverse regions. Thanks to Hollywood, we in India, like the rest of Asiaand the world, are familiar with this part of the United States. But from a geo-political point of view also,the West Coast has a special relation to Asia. It is a reminder that the United States is not only an Atlanticnation linked to Europe, but also a Pacific nation linked to Asia. I am mentioning this because it has animportant bearing on the theme of my address today.
Understanding what is "Strategic"
I have been asked to speak on Indo-US relations in a strategic perspective. Generally, when we use the term‘strategic’, we intend to convey a combination of meanings. It refers to long-term goals as againstimmediate or short-term objectives. It refers to important missions as against relatively less weightyefforts. It calls for a forward-looking orientation, as against a weakness that often bogs nations down inproblems and difficulties of the present. It demands sustained and focused attention as against episodic orsporadic consideration. Since attainment of success carries a far greater importance in a strategicundertaking as against a non-strategic one, it demands a clear roadmap and a carefully devised system ofimplementation.
So, is there a basis for a strategic perspective in the relations between India and the United States? Do ourtwo countries share a common view and a common set of values that require us to pursue certain long-term andimportant goals in the 21st century and beyond? Do these goals have any significance for the needs andconcerns of the rest of the world? Do we have a clear and broadly congruent understanding of these goals? Canwe create a roadmap for our undertaking? And do our two countries feel strongly enough about achieving successin this undertaking?
As far as India is concerned, my answer to all these questions is in the affirmative.
Two Natural Democracies
We are two large and populous countries in the world. Naturally, all big countries with significantpopulations are required to cooperate for the good of the world community. We are not only large and populous,but we also share other attributes that are important for the good of the world community. We are bothdemocracies, a fact that has, historically, not sufficiently contributed to the depth and content of ourbilateral relations. If the 20th century is going to be remembered for any one great achievement, apart fromthe spectacular advances in science and technology, it is the spread of freedom and democracy around theworld. Totalitarian systems collapsed. Many a dictatorship got demolished.
India, unlike many other developing nations, did not have to wage a struggle for democracy. It becamedemocratic as a natural corollary of attaining freedom British rule. At independence, India established ademocratic polity with a Constitution that enshrined the rights and liberties of people, blending them withage-old human values and a vision of social equality and justice. This early vision has blossomed into afirmly rooted, secular, federal, multi-party political system. People talk of India’s democracy with a senseof wonder. The forging and consolidation of our political, economic and emotional national unity in a vast anddiverse land with a population of over one billion people, has been an achievement that we can be truly proudof. I believe it is also of some significance for the world.
We are proud of the fact that elections are held at regular intervals in India. Not even once in the past 55years has a change of government taken place through any kind of violent or undemocratic means. As in theUnited States, the will of the people has always prevailed.
Both India and the United States are open societies, with constitutionally mandated and non-discriminatorycivil liberties for citizens. We both have a free and vigorous press, which we consider a pillar of ourdemocratic system. Both cherish, and zealously guard, freedom of thought, speech and association. I should addhere, with special emphasis, that we both also value freedom of faith. Persecution on the basis of faith isalien to our cultures.
There is yet another important attribute we share. We both are assimilative and integrative societies. We donot believe in exclusivism and exclusion. We not only tolerate diversity, but also celebrate it as adistinctive and enriching feature of respective national identities. Yet, in spite of all the diversity, thereis a strong unity that defines both India and the United States. At a time when the world is shrinking to aGlobal Village, when all countries are becoming increasingly inter-dependent on one another, it has become allthe more necessary to recognize "Unity in Diversity" as a universal ideal.
One might wonder why these commonalities are important for a strategic relationship between our two countries.My answer is that, it is precisely these shared attributes that the world of the 21st century is going to needin greater and ever greater measure. Preserving and promoting these values is an important mission for anynation that possesses them, and for any two such nations to do so collaboratively. This, I wish to submit, isa strong basis for a strategic relationship between India and the United States.
There is another basis. Other factors apart, one of the tests of whether two countries can have a strategicrelationship is whether their best minds resonate with each other, and also whether their ordinary citizenshave a good feeling about each other. On this yardstick, the answer to the question "Can India and USA havea strategic relationship?" is self-evident. Even though geo-political factors sometimes affected ourbilateral relations negatively, they have never succeeded in impacting people-to-people perceptions about oneanother. Similarly, we know that the best representatives of India and the United States have always admiredthe intrinsic strengths of our two societies. The names of Swami Vivekananda, Mahatma Gandhi and RabindranathTagore on the Indian side, and of Walt Whitman, Ralph Waldo Emerson and Martin Luther King on your sidereadily come to mind.
Friends, today the relations between India and the United States are characterized by an unprecedenteddynamism and willingness on both sides to impart breadth and depth to them. Several factors have contributedto this positive development. I wish to mention a few of them.